src=" Mirrorless on the Job: One week with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 - MirrorLessons - The Best Mirrorless Camera Reviews
In Depth

Date: 05/12/2013 | By: Mathieu

Mirrorless on the Job: One week with the Olympus OM-D E-M1

Canon EOS 7D, 1/8, f/ 4/1, ISO 1600

Mirrorless on the Job: One week with the Olympus OM-D E-M1

The release of the new Olympus OM-D E-M1 has dramatically increased photographers’ interest in the Micro Four Thirds system. I had the chance to test it out for a day during the Castle Leslie event in Ireland but to fully understand how good a camera is for professional work, it was necessary that I use it in the field for my weekly photography assignments.

Olympus Europe kindly sent us the camera and three different lenses for one week. This allowed me to use it as my main camera for work and even bring it on a very short trip to France (you can check out my 5-axis stabilisation article here). It has been a very busy week with the E-M1!

One of the things that surprised me was that several of my Italian colleagues asked me “Is that the new OM-D?” while I was out on the job. The E-M1 seems to be the first MFT camera to have really captured the attention of professional photographers.

But is it really worthy of all the attention?

E-M1, 1/80, f/ 18/10, ISO 200
E-M1, 1/80, f/ 1.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 – OOC JPG
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 4/1, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 4, ISO 800 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

N.B.: All the images in this article are post-processed RAW files, unless otherwise specified.

N.B.: On September 2014, Olympus released the firmware version 2.0 that adds lots of new functionalities to the camera. More details at the end of this article.

A new reference

Design & Ergonomics

E-M5, 1/1, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
Holding the E-M1

To find something I didn’t like about the camera, I had to turn to something not even related to the camera body itself – the supplied strap. And not that there is anything wrong with the strap; it’s just too big for my taste and the large brand name sewn into it is less discreet than I would prefer.

E-M5, 1/6, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
The big E-M1 strap

I honestly tried to find a flaw in the OM-D E-M1’s design but couldn’t.

Some call it ugly (I don’t agree), but I haven’t yet heard a critical word about the functionality of its design. The grip, the dials, the button placement, the customisable possibilities, the weight and the balance, they are all perfect when you hold and use the camera.

I could clearly sense that Olympus spent quite some time studying the design of its new flagship camera and this attention to detail has given birth to a perfect result. I am also glad to see that Olympus listened to much of the feedback users provided. All the little quirks of the E-M5 have been substantially improved.

The E-M1 has been designed for professionals above all and you sense it from the first moment you grab the camera.

In Ireland I used the camera with the battery grip attached, which is a welcome feature for professionals who like a better grip for portrait orientation shots. For me, the built-in grip is more than enough. During this week of intense usage, I never felt the need to add that extra weight and volume. I like the MFT system for its compactness and to me the E-M1 body represents the perfect design.

E-M5, 6/10, f/ 56/10, ISO 200
A perfect combo: OM-D E-M1 with the Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

Until now, I had always considered the Panasonic GH3 the best MFT camera for ergonomics; its DSLR shape presupposes good ergonomics. Let’s be honest, it doesn’t matter how big or heavy a DSLR is, the grip is always perfect and the usability is very straightforward. The E-M1 is the same, but with its own design and lightweight advantages.

Everything in the right place


The OM-D E-M1 has 6 customisable buttons in addition to the dedicated functions assigned to the arrow pad, burst and AF mode buttons. Last but not least, the two main dials are also customisable with the switch found on the rear of the camera next to the viewfinder.

E-M5, 13/10, f/ 4/1, ISO 200
The switch

All these options make the E-M1 one of the most customisable cameras I’ve ever used when it comes to button layout. Actually, it took some time to figure out the best combination for my needs. The buttons I found the most pleasant and quick to use are the two on the front, next to the lens mount. You can reach them very easily with your two middle fingers when holding the camera, and that’s where I assigned the AF area select and AF home options.

E-M5, 4/1, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
My favorite function buttons at the front.

These buttons allow me to quickly change my focus point or bring it back to the centre without changing the position of a single finger. You can use the two aperture/shutter speed dials to vary the point’s position. And that’s another thing I really like about the E-M1.

You can control almost anything using the two main dials, which you can naturally reach with your finger and thumb.

You press the buttons you need, adjust the settings, then half press the shutter release button to prepare to fire. If you need to quickly adjust the aperture or shutter speed before taking the shot, your fingers are already in the right place. Once your mind fully adopts this mechanism, it becomes a real joy to use.

The only negative aspect has to do with the shutter release button. It is ultra sensitive. Sometimes when turning the front dial, my finger accidentally touches it and has me exit out of the setting I am adjusting. It could be related to the model I was testing so I’ll wait to try another one to see if I find the same thing.

Below you can see my preferred button customisation:

There is also that amazing beast of a viewfinder. It is currently the best EVF I’ve ever seen on a digital camera. It is bright, sharp, and very detailed: the first electronic viewfinder that doesn’t make me long for an optical viewfinder. The quality and specs are the same as the external VF-4. If you set the EVF Auto Luminance option to ON, the EVF automatically adjusts its brightness. That’s why I’ve never felt the need to activate the Live View Boost (an option that makes the images clearly visible but doesn’t give an authentic exposure preview). The EVF Auto Luminance works just fine even in low-light conditions. Furthermore, the camera firmware version 2.0 released in September 2014 reduces the EVF time lag to 16 msec (when frame rate setting is high).

E-M5, 25/10, f/ 8/1, ISO 200
The E-M1 EVF

The only limit, which you’ll find on any EVF, occurs when you shoot in low-light condition with only one strong source of light. The contrast between shadows and light is very hard and the EVF will tend to show overexposed highlights. In this case, put your trust in the camera’s metering.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2/1, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

One negative I cannot ignore regarding the functionality of the camera is the lack of a dual SD card slot. This is something that professional photographers can be very picky about. Personally, I have never owned a camera with dual memory card slot, and have never had a problem so far. But more than one photographer has told me that while the E-M1 seems interesting, the lack of a dual slot card has stopped them from considering it for work. Professionals can be very demanding.

E-M1 on the job: Contemporary dance

Image quality

E-M1, 1/160, f/ 18/10, ISO 500
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 1.8, ISO 500 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8

The image quality, which I already loved on the Olympus OM-D E-M5 and E-P5, is confirmed on the E-M1 at 100%. I was curious to put it to the test in a very specific situation, so I chose a contemporary dance show that took place on two different dates. I always prefer to shoot a show like this more than once if I cannot see a rehearsal. Doing so allows me to have a second chance to take something I might have missed the first time. The performance ‘Cioccolato’ by the Italian dance company Egri-Bianco Danza was held in conjunction with the chocolate festival (CioccoltaTò) which took place that week in Turin.

E-M1, 1/160, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 12mm f/2

This kind of photography is excellent for putting aspects like colour rendition, ISO and autofocus to the test (more on that later). Usually in this kind of situation, the environment is very contrasted with just a few strong lights on the dancers. Coloured lights with a mix of different sources like LED and incandescent are also very common.

With dancers, speed is very important. In order to keep their movements sharp, you need to stay at a shutter speed of around 1/200 or faster. I sometimes used 1/100 but that is the very limit, unless you have a specific result in mind like the example below, where I wanted to show the movement of the swinging violin.

E-M1, 1/25, f/ 28/10, ISO 640
E-M1, 1/25, f/ 2.8, ISO 640 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
E-M1, 1/10, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/10, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Photographing a show like this means finding a good balance between ISO and aperture. I had the M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8, the Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8 and the 17mm f/1.8 with me and I almost always used an f/2.8 aperture. I also set the ISO to auto with 3200 as the limit and White Balance to Auto. The camera mostly stayed at 3200 ISO, which I find pretty acceptable but I think that is some cases it could have chosen a lower ISO value. At 3200 ISO there is some loss in detail but sometimes it is also a result of movement or the focus being slightly soft.

Most of the time, the E-M1 metering worked very well. I always tend to slightly underexpose and then recover some shadows. With MFT sensors, highlights tend to be weaker. Occasionally, the camera overexposed the images too much but I admit that in some situations the lights coming from the ceiling were very intense. The camera usually manages to find a good mix, but if highlights are overexposed, you won’t recover them. I must say that it happened only a couple of times, and I converted those images to B&W later on in Lightroom.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8

The colour rendition is also very accurate. Colours have always been one of Olympus’ strongest points and the E-M1 proves very precise regarding this aspect. I was glad to see how well the auto WB worked as well. Not a single miss.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 1600
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 1600 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

The most critical situations are when there are dominating colour tints in the scene. In the photo below, the colours are very accurate but the combination of all those tints as well as the strong contrast between the centre and the corners caused the photo to lose some detail in the coloured highlights (especially in the red costume). In this example, it would have been better if I had underexposed the photo a little more as it would have preserved the details better.

In other situations, it was either all red or all blue. Situations like this really put the sensor to the test as it has to work all the details with a single colour channel. The E-M1 suffered more on the blue tints but overall I found the results quite good. We are indeed talking about extreme situations here. In this case, shooting raw is a must, as even a few little adjustments during post-processing can help recover some details. For a couple of pictures, I also managed to recover a lot of details in the shadows. I clearly saw an improvement with the RAF files in this regard.

E-M1, 1/160, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

While the raw files will give you more flexibility for processing the pictures, I was also curious to see how the JPG engine of the E-M1 worked in these unique conditions. And just as it proved worthy before on the E-M5, most of the JPGs on the E-M1 are usable.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – OOC JPG – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – OOC JPG – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

Of course one could point out that a full frame DSLR such as the Canon 5d mkIII or the Nikon D4 with their crazy native ISO range would have given better results, and I can’t argue with that. But for me the E-M1 provides more than acceptable image quality, and pixel peeping a dance show photograph won’t make the photo itself any better. It is all about the way in which you capture intense and important moments of the show that best represent the choreography.

The OM-D also has some advantages over DSLRs that can make a difference, and one of them is the shutter sound. As great as a DSLR may be, the “click” it produces every time you take a picture doesn’t remain unheard. Most of these shows also have silent parts without music. I often see photographers covering their DSLRs with special sound mufflers to minimise the sound of the shutter. The E-M1 shutter sound is far more discreet. I had people behind me on the second day and they were never bothered by me taking photos. This doesn’t mean that the E-M1 is better; it simply makes things easier and allows the photographer to worry less about discretion.

Autofocus: the good and the great

While my expectations were already high with regards to image quality, I was very curious to see how the new and highly-praised autofocus on the E-M1 would work. In the end, it proved tremendously efficient.

The autofocus is one of the most significant updates on the E-M1: the sensor incorporates phase detection that works in AF-C/tracking mode for MFT lenses. It also works in AF-S mode with FT lenses via an adapter.

For a show like this, I mainly use tracking as the dancers can move very quickly and unpredictably in all directions. I was really surprised to see how well the tracking managed to follow the dancers, even when they were wearing dark brown clothes in front of a black background. (The Lumix GX7 also did well in this respect – check out the in-depth review here!)

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

There were some misses, especially when the dancers suddenly changed direction or came too close to me (when using a telephoto lens). It performed well with both the M.Zuiko 75mm and the Lumix 35-100mm. I didn’t notice any substantial differences but my impression was that it might be slightly faster with the Panasonic lens. A lens I can’t wait to try in this kind of situation is the recently-announced M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8.

The important thing when working with AF-C or AF tracking is to set the smallest AF target point. If you keep a large point or work with a group target, it can become a nightmare as the camera will often focus back and forth and lose its lock on the subject several times.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 3200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 3200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

The other aspect that makes the E-M1 fit for the task is its continuous shooting capabilities. It has a maximum of 10fps in H mode and 6.5fps in L mode. The L mode is important as it will give focus priority while the H mode gives priority to speed. In a case like this, I prefer focus over speed. But even in L mode, the camera is as fast as most DSLRs. The buffer capabilities are very good as well and will let you take all the shots you need. Just make sure to have a fast-writing SD card.

E-M1 on the job: reportage and events

Speed, face priority, flash units

The biggest assignment for my work this week with the National Cinema Museum was the opening of the Torino Film Festival. Red carpet, actors, actresses, politicians; in short, a lot of people to shoot and not to miss. The other museum photographer Sabrina and I always go together and while she takes the group shots, I focused on the close-ups. This is another situation where the autofocus needs to be darn good as VIPs will often stop for only a few seconds.

E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 200 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 400
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 400 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

I switched between the Lumix 35-100mm and the M.Zuiko 75mm. The latter is a portrait lens and works very well for these kinds of shots but of course a zoom can be more versatile. It’s a personal choice. If I had two bodies, I might have chosen to work with primes. With one body the zoom on its own is easier to use.

E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 800 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 800 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8

In this case I also used the face priority option and I must say it works very well in AF-C (tracking wasn’t necessary here). Again, be sure to choose the smallest AF target point. Face recognition works great with one or two people. If there are more, the camera might choose to focus on the guy in the background, rendering the others in the foreground out-of-focus.

An assignment like this one helped me realise how fast the E-M1 is in all its operations. From AF and burst, to the camera software and quickly playing back the shots, it is all stable and fast. The only thing that happened twice, especially when performing continuous shooting, is that the camera froze. I had to remove the battery in order to turn it off and turn it on again, and regain control of the camera. It seems that other E-M1 users have experienced a similar phenomenon. Apparently Olympus is aware of the issue and is working on a fix. Hopefully, we’ll see a firmware update soon (this issue has been resolved since firmware version 1.3). There has been one recently (1.1) but the “lock-up” issue hasn’t been mentioned in the release notes.

E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 400
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 400 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 400
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 400 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

As I already mentioned, the E-M1 is very fast for both AF and burst mode but you need a very good and powerful flash to keep up with that speed. Sadly, that wasn’t always the case with the FL-600r. Its reload time can be too slow when you have only a few seconds and you use continuous shooting. You need a bigger flash and that in a way is a small limit. It’s a shame to have a such wonderfully small package and ruin it by mounting a big flash that will unbalance the entire set-up.

E-M5, 6/10, f/ 56/10, ISO 200
The E-M1 with the Fl-600r flash unit

That being said, I managed to take all the pictures I needed and the combo worked fine, but instead of shooting like a paparazzi, I had to carefully choose the right moment to take the shot or two consecutive shots maximum.

E-M1, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/100, f/ 2.8, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 22/10, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 2.2, ISO 800

The joy of working light with primes

While zoom lenses can make shooting easy to handle, I must admit that I really enjoyed using the camera with prime lenses. The M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 has become one my favourite lenses; it’s very sharp wide open and fast. I love the 35mm equivalent angle of view and since MFT primes are very small, you can really reduce the package to a minimum while extending the image quality to the maximum.

And yes, shallow depth of field is there too!

E-M1, 1/160, f/ 18/10, ISO 640
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 1.8, ISO 640 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/60, f/ 18/10, ISO 1250
E-M1, 1/60, f/ 1.8, ISO 1250 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

The 75mm is another lens I love, one of the best in the MFT system and perfect for portraits even though its focal length can sometimes be difficult to use in cramped environments. But when you see the quality, it is really impressive!

Image quality: Additional considerations

Along with the lack of an AA filter, the E-M1 features a new sensor which improves several aspects of the E-M5/E-P5 sensor. However, if you expect to see a drastic difference between it and the other high-end Olympus MFT cameras, you could be disappointed. In a real world situation, the E-M1 and E-M5 files are almost identical. You really need to dig deep to find some noteworthy differences. The most important concerns high ISO from 6400 and up. The E-M1 retains more sharpness and a better colour rendition with less loss of detail. It becomes really obvious at 12800 and 25600.

This point may not interest everyone, as many photographers have said that they are not interested to going higher than 1600 with a MFT sensor, but to me knowing that the highest ISO values have been improved is a plus. This means I can use a higher ISO when in need, knowing that the E-M1 will handle them just fine. I sometimes noticed looking at the E-M5 files that in some situations, the lack of detail in the shadows at 6400 ISO could be very visible. This is something that doesn’t happen with the E-M1, from what I have seen so far.

I didn’t perform any extensive tests but my feeling is that there is certainly an overall improved sharpness compared to the E-M5 due to the lack of an AA filter. However, it doesn’t really stand out – you need to pixel-peep and look for it. One might expect a more pronounced difference with the absence of an AA filter but it is also true that the E-M5, like the E-P5, had a very weak AA filter to begin with. This may explain the minimal difference. I think that with the new sensor and the new TruePic VII Image processor, there was no longer any need for an AA filter as moiré is handled pretty well by the internal processor.

The difference might be more noticeable with prints, but unfortunately I din’t have the time to perform a comparison.

What matters is that the image quality has been improved with small yet important details. This makes the OM-D E-M1 the best MFT camera ever released.

That said, some users have come across an issue regarding long exposure with the NR filter deactivated. The E-M1 shows a lot more noise than the E-M5. I took some shots, comparing them with identical images taken with the E-M5 and the Lumix GX7, and it is true that the E-M1 has more noise with long exposures while the NR filter set to off.

I understand that this can be a problem for astrophotographers as the NR for long exposures is actually a second dark exposure (the shutter remains closed) or dark frame taken by the camera. The camera subtracts the dark frame from the first exposure and removes any undesired noise. This process increase the time it takes to complete the shot and may prove problematic if you want to shoot star trails.
Personally, I am not into astrophotography and for any situation where I need a long exposure, I will keep the NR to auto.

The E-M1 as a travel companion

In addition to the assignments I had to do, I also went to France for three days for a filmmaking job. Thankfully, I also had some free time to look around the city and take some pictures. The E-M1, being small, also works very well for street and travel photography. If you use primes such as the wonderful 17mm f/1.8 (34mm on full frame), you will find it a joy to use as it is the ideal focal length for street photography. The fast AF and colour rendition is great.

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 8/1, ISO 200
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/640, f/ 18/10, ISO 200
E-M1, 1/640, f/ 1.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

The camera also performs well regarding dynamic range both with a single file or by using the HDR technique. The E-M1 doesn’t actually do HDR on camera but there is an HDR option (the same as bracketing) where it will take the shots in a burst. You can of course set the amount of shots and the exposure variation between the shots. I usually take three or five with 1ev difference.

E-M1, 1/60, f/ 56/10, ISO 200
Full flare!
E-M1, 1/60, f/ 5.6, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/5000, f/ 18/10, ISO 200
E-M1, 1/5000, f/ 1.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Finally, as I already mentioned before, one of the strongest points of the E-M1, as well as the other Olympus models, is colour reproduction. Colours look natural yet they are powerful. I often use the vivid profile but the natural profile works well too. Skin tones are also very accurate. As for any camera, if you want to take complete advantage of the colour rendition you need to use the OOC JPG. With the raw file, you either use the proprietary software (very slow) or some colour profiles like the Huelight color profile. They will give you a better rendition if you use Lightroom to catalog and edit your photographs as I do.

E-M1, 1/8, f/ 8, ISO 200  - M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8
E-M1, 1/8, f/ 8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Lenses: why MFT makes more sense

The OM-D E-M1 represents a point of no return for Olympus cameras. It marks the end of Four Thirds DSLRs and confirms Oympus willingness to concentrate solely on MFT. At the same time, the camera has been designed to be fully compatible with all FT lenses via an adaptor and that’s the main reason for the E-M1’s phase detection AF. I had the chance to try some FT lenses at Castle Leslie and while the AF wasn’t as fast as it was with MFT lenses, it was still pretty good. I can also understand the desire to use FT lenses for users who already own some or use very specific pieces of glass. But as I’ve already pointed out, I feel that the biggest advantage of the MFT system and the reason I have embraced it is for its portability. Having an E-M1 and sticking a big fat lens on it just doesn’t make sense; it would lose its most attractive aspect. Sure, it is nice to know that if one day, for a specific assignment, I need a super fast telephoto, I can rent a FT 300mm 2.8, knowing that the camera will handle it no problem. But until that day comes, I am happy with the compactness of the MFT lens selection as I feel it is what suits the system best.

You can also read the following article: Using Four Thirds lenses with the Olympus OM-D E-M1: When are they suitable?

E-M1, 1/1600, f/ 5.6, ISO 800
E-M1, 1/1600, f/ 5.6, ISO 800 – Zuiko 300mm f/2.8

Note: Olympus announced the silver E-M1 and the M.Zuiko 12mm (non limited anymore) on September 2014. The paragraph below is not valid anymore.

There’s only one aspect which can be a little bit frustrating and it concerns the design of the lenses. Precisely, I’m talking about colours. Most of the M.Zuiko primes have only been released in silver. Then the black versions started to be released this year but for some lenses like the 12mm, the black version is a limited edition product, thus far more expensive. I know, this is a very fastidious comment, but for those who want to be as discreet as possible, having a shiny silver lens on the E-M1 isn’t the best thing. There won’t be a silver E-M1, and trading in a silver lens for a black one may not be the most economically sound decision in the world. But hey, we photographers can be very picky, can’t we?

Firmware update

When it comes to Firmware updates, usually we praise Fujifilm for its ability to renovate its cameras with new functionalities and improvements, even for more than two years old models. This time, I have also to highlight the great job done by Olympus with the OM-D E-M1. The firmware version 2.0, released in September 2014, adds 8 new functionalities and 16 operability improvements.

While I recommend to check out this article for the complete list of new features, here are the three most important addition:

  • Keystone Compensation (Digital Shift) allows you to correct perspective when shooting with wide angle lenses
  • Tethered Shooting System allows you to remote control the camera from a computer
  • Live Composite photography, same function also found on the E-M10 and E-PL7

I’m glad to see that Olympus is working harder on firmwares. This kind of update gives a longer life to the camera and makes customers happy.

Conclusion: why the E-M1 will take the E-M5’s place as my primary camera for work

E-M1, 1/160, f/ 28/10, ISO 1600
E-M1, 1/160, f/ 2.8, ISO 1600 – Lumix 35-100mm f/1.8

There are many other aspects worth mentioning which make the E-M1 a giant amongst cameras. I already wrote a dedicated article about the wonderful 5-axis stabilisation. The camera also has other interesting features such as WiFi capabilities (with full manual control), Live Bulb and Live Composite. The bottom line is that the OM-D E-M1 is probably the most complete camera I’ve ever tried in terms of options and features available. The video mode’s bitrate has also been improved but it’s still not up to the level of the competition in my opinion, especially compared to Lumix. It is perhaps the only real weak point of the camera but Olympus made it clear during our interview that they prefer to concentrate on stills rather than video. At least for now. So what is left to say really?

E-M5, 1/6, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
The camera of the year for me.

This article wasn’t meant to be a complete review and while I didn’t dig into certain aspects, I can already say that the E-M1 is, in my humble opinion, the camera of the year. I don’t like to rank as every camera has its strong points and weak points, and it is also a question of personal feeling.

For me, the E-M1 is the camera of the year because it represents an achievement in still photography for the MFT system.

The E-M1 demonstrates that MFT is a fully mature system which is completely suitable for professional needs. As I’ve said many times on this website, I switched to mirrorless mainly for the weight and size of the cameras. But it wasn’t just a question of saving my back – I just find it so much easier to work with a small yet powerful camera. I can move easily even in a closed environment full of people. People are generally less intimidated and most importantly, I enjoy my assignments more than I ever used to. And now, I can do all this with a camera that is almost perfect – super fast, completely weather proof (although it makes sense with weatherproof lenses) and all the latest features technology can offer. And I didn’t forget to mention the 5-axis stabilisation; I actually wrote a dedicated article about it as it is one of the greatest things Olympus has ever put into a camera!

E-M1, 1/200, f/ 18/10, ISO 1250
E-M1, 1/200, f/ 1.8, ISO 1250 – M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8

Certainly, the camera has some little quirks which I’ve already mentioned throughout the article but when you start deeply analysing every detail, it is normal to find some weak points. The noise found in long exposure shots (with noise reduction set to off) isn’t something that bothers me for the kind of photography I do. A larger concern is the “lock-up” issue I referred to before, but hopefully a fix will be on the way soon in the form of a firmware update.

At this point, we arrive at the question: what could be substantially improved in the next few years?

And how much margin for improvement is there regarding the image quality of MFT sensors? This is something which only engineers can answer for the time being.With the mirrorless market being in an evolutionary phase, it is hard to predict which system will prevail, but what we know is that the MFT system is currently one of the strongest out there in terms of overall quality, performance and lens variety.

E-M1, 1/60, f/ 28/10, ISO 1600
E-M1, 1/60, f/ 2.8, ISO 1600 – Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8

You can find the OM-D E-M1 on and

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Mathieu Gasquet

Mathieu Gasquet is a professional photographer with French and Italian origins. Besides running his own video and photography studio 3Dit Lab, he is also the official photographer for the National Cinema Museum in Turin. You can follow him on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Th-Th-Timmey

    I understand and agree completely, LR has many other advantages and it’s quite easy to use in general, takes the hassle out of the processing. I’m just saying that it’s not really camera/sensor flaw, the colours are blown out on a software processing level.

  • Mathieu

    It think that it all depends on how the software applies the colour profile. There are RAW developers more accurate than Lightroom but I prefer the latter for many other reasons (and also because I’m used to it now).

  • Th-Th-Timmey

    Then maybe it’s just the RPP that is superior in that sense. You can have a look at this article if you want, it’s in russian, but there are images there for comparison, processed in LR and RPP. The difference is quite apparent, and maybe it’s the solution for the overblown color channels. I would love to try the RPP myself, but I’m on windows, and unfortunately that app is mac only (and also free, seems it’s some kind of a passion project for some IT/photo guys).

  • Heather Broster

    Cheers, Greg. That’s a really hard question. Since we’re always testing new gear, there actually isn’t one camera we use the most. However, if I were to quit reviewing tomorrow and only use one camera, it would probably be the E-M1 or GX7. I love how compact Micro Four Thirds lenses are, and the image quality is superb.

  • Greg

    love the articles guys-since you review so many cameras which is your mirrorless that you use the most?

  • Mathieu

    I also post process those images in Capture and found the same results concerning the red/blue color and loss of detail. I do not find Lightroom that different, at least concerning Sony RAW files.

  • Th-Th-Timmey

    On the red/blue color and loss of detail – I’m not sure what you are using for raw conversion, but I’ve read an article on lightrooms horrible colour conversion from raw files. They showed how much more authentic and detailed color rendered with another converter – Raw Photo Processor for example, and even capture one. The author uses em5 m2. I’ve noticed loss of detail in saturated red/blue photos too. Maybe adobe has better algorithms for dslr cameras, they were longer on the market and are more popular. Recently, I’ve tried using “camera color profile” in LR, instead of Adobe standard and I find it better in terms of color rendition. Unfortunately I can’t use the raw photo processor because I’m using Windows and it’s a mac only (it’s also completely free).

  • Mathieu

    Just to list all the possible explanations: do you use any of the anti-shock setting by any chance? There is also the option of disabling the IBIS when shooting in continuous mode, did you try that as well?

  • Andres

    There’s no specific shooting speed. It’s happened at 6fps in both Lo and Hi. I tend to notice this phenomenon during demanding processing. For example, a dog running at me coming from the shadows and into sunshine. The camera may stutter during the transition. Almost as if the buffer is filling up, but then the camera speeds up again. Other times inside where the ISO is bumped up to 1600. On rare occasions, when this happens, the camera locks up.

    I too am running firmware 3.0. Since you have not experienced this problem after the update, I’m starting to wonder whether I may be developing a shutter issue.

  • Mathieu

    Hi Andres and thanks for your feedback. I never experienced the issue again after the firmware 3.0. Which continuous shooting speed you are using?

  • Andres

    The c-af lock up issue is still present. I’m running firmware v3.0 and have continued to experience lock ups from time to time. It appears to me to be related to the processing power of the camera. I have noticed that when it happens, it usually involves a scene that requires a higher level of processing do to the complexity of the colors, tone, and lightning. You even notice it in the increased lag you see in the viewfinder. It’s to the point now that I try to avoid c-af unless the scene is fairly standard without placing significant requirements on processing. It’s a shame, but I’ve lost enough photos and videos to have learned my lesson. It doesn’t happen too often, but often enough to be an issue.

  • Mathieu

    I don’t think that you can recharge the OM-D battery through the USB port and even if you could it wouldn’t work when using the camera. Power must be off in order to charge it.

  • Guyzie

    Hi, I wanted to know if there is anyway to plug an external battery pack (see link below) to the camera and charge it while using it in the field? If so that may alleviate the need to purchase multiple batteries and serve as a backup.



  • Mathieu

    Hi Andy, you are absolutely right, thanks for pointing it out. Since I wrote this article last year, I then forgot to update it now that there is a silver E-M1 and a 12mm black :)

  • Andy Taylor

    Hi, i absolutely love your site and this by no means is slating you whatsoever, just wanted to get that out there, but may i just paste this here what you stated above.

    There’s only one aspect which can be a little bit frustrating and it concerns the design of the lenses. Precisely, I’m talking about colours. Most of the M.Zuiko primes have only been released in silver. Then the black versions started to be released this year but for some lenses like the 12mm, the black version is a limited edition product, thus far more expensive. I know, this is a very fastidious comment, but for those who want to be as discreet as possible, having a shiny silver lens on the E-M1 isn’t the best thing. There won’t be a silver E-M1, and trading in a silver lens for a black one may not be the most economically sound decision in the world. But hey, we photographers can be very picky, can’t we?

    IN PARTICULAR THERE WONT BE A SILVER E-M1, i am about to order one, and thanks to your solid reviews, please keep up the good work, love it!

  • Terri

    Do you know if there are certain settings that would help make the continuous auto focus with tracking easier to use. So far, I am finding that the focus square jumps around a lot, and I’m finding it hard to stay with an object ( a flying bird for example). Any tips? I’m heading off on an East African safari in a couple of weeks, and I want to make sure that I get the most out of my camera that it is capable of. Thanks!

  • Mathieu

    Hi Irene, I don’t do lots of studio work but the only option I see is to turn on the live view boost and maybe also increase the EVF brightness and turn off the auto luminance option. Let me know if that helps.

  • Irene

    Can you please speak about using the EM-1 in the studio – and the EVF issue and live view boost? I like to shoot either against a black or high key white background. However, I am missing the pleasure of looking through the viewfinder and “seeing” my clients! I understand that I can turn live view boost on, but it doesn’t solve the issue completely. They still appear over or under exposed. Any tips would be appreciated.

  • Mathieu

    I think that the whirring noise you are referring to is related to the 5-axis stabilisation. When you half press the shutter release button, the IS activates and makes that low whirring noise. So the answer is yes, the E-M1 has it just like the E-M5 and the Pen E-P5.

  • Tor Hjaltun

    Does the om 1 have the same whirring noice as the om5?

  • Mathieu

    Hi Edward, there is simply no “silent mode” or “electronic shutter” option, like on the Panasonic GX7 for example (that can be completely silent). So the noise is due to normal mechanical shutter of the camera. It is slightly louder than the OM-D E-M5 but less than the Pen E-P5.

  • Edward

    Hi So the camera can not be completly silent? What’s making the noise? Thank you Edward

  • Jim Kahnweiler

    Thanks for the hint, Mathieu. It seems to work on first look, just looking; but I haven’t been in the studio to try it for real. I’ll let you know.

  • Mathieu

    Hi Jim, in the Custom Menus > Disp/PC > Try to set Live View Boost to “On”. That will give priority to make the image visible on the display/EVF instead of giving you a preview of the exposure.
    Let me know if it solves the problem!

  • Jim Kahnweiler

    EM-1 is a fine camera, but that we know. It has a PC connector for studio lighting, but after my first assignment using it with strobes, I could not find a way to aim the camera with modeling lights. The flash exposure is vastly greater and if I set the camera for the ambient light to view the subject it over exposes the image. If I set the camera for the flash exposure the view finder is dark. Is there a modeling light preview? A way to set the viewfinder for the ambient light and switch to flash exposure when the shutter is pressed?


  • Mathieu

    Thanks Tore, the E-M1 is a great camera and can cover most of the photography genres. Size matters only when you think it matters. The reality is that the MFT system can be used for professional work. Certainly other sensors and system can be more suitable for certain kind of photography, but as I always say, it is important that the photographer works with a system he feels comfortable with 😉

  • Tore Hansen

    Hi !

    Great review of the E-M1. I am a entusiast photographer from Norway and have used Nikon on portraits the last 5-6 years, but also Olympus Pen and OM-D E-M5 which was meant to be a walkaround camera. Now im considering the E-M1 as a Nikon replacement even that this means to go from FX fullformat to mFT sensor. Testet 45mm f.1.8 and E-M5 in studio earlier this week for the first time, and it worked wonderful with one picture choosen by, used as bannerpicture on one of the OM-D groups on Facebook, great feedback from Olympus Nordic and picture of the day friday on Norway’s largest photosite. Some say size matters…

  • erocinov

    I used to own an X-E1. I own an EM1. The olympus is a reliable camera with a lot of features, very good build quality, superior IQ and can be used in a professional level. The fuji is too quirky, years behind in technology, usability, build and professionalism. If anybody would say the opposite is nothing but unrealistic. It is not a matter of opinion, it is the truth.

    However, fuji seems promising and may be in 2-3 years we will see better products from them.

    By the way very nice review.

  • Mathieu

    The 75mm is probably the best lens I mount on a MFT camera. Portrait is its favorite genre, even if the 150mm equivalent length can sometimes be too long. I am very curious to try the Panasonic/Leica 42,5mm f/1.2 that could become the reference for the system regarding portrait lens. With the E-M1, you will have lots of lens too choose. The Olympus primes and some Lumix lenses are the best option for this camera. I love the 12mm, the 17mm, the 45mm. Small yet very nice lenses.
    As for bit depth, I can give you a very technical answer but based on my experience with the two camera, they are both capable of great skin tone renderings. Then it depends on the light, the white balance and other things.

  • Fred Abery

    thx for that quick reply! I tend to use the optical finder more than the EVF, which I find pretty ordinary, especially at night in street lighting (lags like a tortoise). And yes, I have tried the ‘smash the shutter button’ technique for AF- it’s got a similar fail rate to the regular misses of the AF system. The camera still has other bugs, too. Sometimes it takes 4-5 secs to power up- the firmware is up-to-date, but it’s still not completely debugged, IMO.
    I’m a Fuji fanboy- like so many others, I love the Fuji philosophy and I also thought I could make do with all the foibles- forgive them because the IQ is so good, but I’m afraid the honeymoon is over.
    Your enthusiasm for the AF of the Oly has won me. And I’ll only be sacrificing a little in IQ by dropping the sensor size. For me, catching the moment in time is more important than an infinitesimally better IQ at 100% pixel-peeping levels. I do enjoy pixel-peeping, though- and for that purpose, at some later time, I’ll be buying the Sigma DP3 (and I know it’s a bigger nightmare than the Fuji!).

    One last thing is the lenses- I am really keen on the images I’ve seen made with the 75mm/1.8. It seems like an unbeatable portrait lens. I miss the ability to change lenses.

    The other thing is the portrait bit depth- in your opinion, is the Oly comparable to the X100s? DXO Mark still refuse to acknowledge the X-Trans sensor, so nothing about bit depth there. I have seen some gorgeous skin tones made with the Oly, and some that are truly awful- what do you think?
    Thanks again for your response.

  • Mathieu

    Hi Fred, out of curiosity, do you use more the optical or the electronic viewfinder on your X100s?
    Anyway, I own the X100s and extensively tried the E-M1 and I can tell you without hesitating the the AF is faster and more accurate on the OM-D.
    As for image quality, the X100s has a better high ISO performance (less noise) and a better dynamic range. I also love the Fuji colour rendition because they are different than the usual digital cameras, but the Olympus colour are wonderful as well. The E-M1 has the great 5-axis stabilisation and that is truly something unique. So I would say both cameras have great image quality, no worries about that.
    My advice if you have time is to pop in a camera store and try the E-M1 for yourself. You will notice how faster the AF is. Then of course, there could always be a situation where the camera misinterpret the photographer’s will and focus on a different object or on the background, but that can be the case with every camera. What is sure is that you will definitely have less hesitation and AF lock failure on the E-M1.
    That being said, I “learned” to use the X100s knowing its AF limitation sometimes. I often use the AF-C mode as I find the AF more reactive and also try to take shots by composing and pressing the shutter button to the end, without waiting for the green rectangle confirmation. It could work better than expected. Of course, depending on the situation and what kind of picture you want to take.

  • Fred Abery

    Great run-down and pics, Mathieu-
    I am a disillusioned Fuji X100s owner. I upgraded from the X100 after previously ditching a Nikon D800 and a handful of primes (WHY did I ever buy that thing???- I’m only an amateur!). I thought with the new hybrid AF on-chip that the X would have improved AF. Sad to report, the camera is still slow and despite confirming a selected focus point, still focuses on some random object in the background about 30% of the time-YES even in good light! Not impressed. The IQ is stunning for a 16MP cam, but the missed shots make its primary use for me as a street/documentary camera unviable. This new Oly has captured my imagination, but I have a couple of questions.
    In your honest opinion, is the AF better on the OMD EM1 than on the Fuji X100s? And , secondly, is there any real difference in the image quality between the Oly and the X100s? I want to get a few opinions on this because as much as I want a more robust camera ( the weatherproofing is handy, as I currently live in the tropics), I cannot afford to waste money on yet another camera that will make me as frustrated as the X100s has. I want to be confident that when the little square on the focus point goes green and the camera beeps, it is truly focussed on that spot and not on a passing motorcyclist. Can you please advise?
    Thanks, Fred

  • Mathieu

    Thanks for pointing it out Andrea 😉

  • Andrea Costa

    Nice review! BTW it is worth mentioning that the E-M1 CAN do in-camera HDR: in the button hdr menù you have hdr1 and hdr2 (it shoots 4 images and compones them) or the various braketing options (but it only shoots them without compositing).

  • Mathieu

    Grazie Sandro 😉

  • Sandro Tasso

    great review as usual Mathieu!

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owner of this website, Heather Broster, is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, the eBay Partner Network, and the Adorama Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay and Adorama properties. She is also a member of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.