src=" Speed in a small and simple package: Review of the Sony a6000 - MirrorLessons - The Best Mirrorless Camera Reviews

Date: 02/09/2014 | By: Heather

Speed in a small and simple package: Review of the Sony a6000

sony a6000 review

Speed in a small and simple package: Review of the Sony a6000

We’ve been very keen on testing the Sony a6000 since its announcement back in February 2014, but with so many other interesting cameras emerging around the same time, it sadly fell by the wayside. Mathieu did spend a day with the camera during the Turin Colour Run courtesy of Sony Italia, but it wasn’t enough to write up a substantial review. Thankfully, we recently came across a wonderful service here in the UK called, whereby you hire cameras and lenses at a reasonable price for any given length of time. As soon as I saw they had the a6000 in stock, I contacted them and went about preparing for our very first hire!

The Sony a6000 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera that replaces its predecessor, the NEX 6. It has taken everything good about this camera and added a few extra bells and whistles to create a compact and efficient image taking machine. Though it looks like a NEX in almost every sense, Sony has renamed it Alpha to simplify their MILC line-up, hence the ‘a’ in the name.

ILCE-6000, 1/800, f/ 10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/800, f/ 10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 10/1, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 10, ISO 200

The NEX design improved

In 2013, I had the chance to test two cameras from Sony’s NEX line-up: the original Nex 5 and the Nex 3n. Both left me with a very good impression, though I found it hard to fall in love with the mechanical appearance and feel of the cameras. They were functional, yes, but lacking a certain aesthetic beauty found in other compact system cameras.

The same drawback is still present in the Sony a6000 but it somehow looks and feels more like a proper camera than a small computer with an additional image taking function like the NEXs. The protruding grip is large, deep and covered in a nice “grippy” plastic that gives you confidence in your grasp on the camera. The buttons and dials are solid, well-made and easy to access, but not so accessible that you end up pressing them by accident. It features a very smooth 3-inch tilting screen for low and high angle shots which, while not touch sensitive, is bright, crisp and fairly easy to see in bright sunlight. The viewfinder, too, is enjoyable to use thanks to its realistic representations of the colours in a scene and quick refresh rate.

ILCE-7S, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 100
Front view of the Sony a6000 with the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 attached

The camera includes a pop-up flash that cleverly rotates upward, making it useful for bouncing light off a ceiling or wall, and a hot shoe for additional accessories.

Those who heavily rely on external controls as opposed to menu digging will love the plethora of function and custom buttons on the camera. Overall, I was pleased with the default functions assigned to each button–the only one I changed was the C2 custom button in shooting mode, as I found it more useful to set it to Centre Lock-On AF (tracking) than the default In-Camera Guide.

ILCE-7S, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 100
Rear view of the a6000

So, if this camera is so well designed, what would I change?

First of all, I feel that it would have made much more sense to place the Centre Lock-On AF function in the Focus Mode menu alongside AF-S and AF-C than in its own sub-menu. Even with it set to the C2 function button, you first have to press the button, select On, and finally, focus on your subject before it will even activate. In the time it takes you to prepare, your speedy subject will have moved on.

I would have also appreciated the possibility to directly change the AF point in Flexible Spot mode using the directional keys on the D-Pad, but this function doesn’t exist on any Sony mirrorless cameras. Hopefully, this is something they will add in the future as it is very a useful feature on the OM-D E-M1. By default, the Focus Area button is set to the centre of the D-Pad. Only after pressing it can you move the AF point around the screen using the directional keys. (An alternative could be to make the LCD touch sensitive on future cameras, as you would be able to choose your AF point with the touch of a finger like on recent Lumix and Olympus cameras.)

Finally, a complaint I had about the NEX cameras has carried over to the a6000, which is the loud shutter. The silent shutter option found on the Sony A7s makes discreet shooting so much easier, so I don’t really understand why Sony wasn’t able to implement the same feature on the a6000.

Speed is the word

The features of the Sony a6000 that have got camera reviewers raving are its incredible hybrid AF system that covers 92% of the frame with 179 phase-detect points, and its tracking capabilities. The Camera Store pitted it against today’s high-end mirrorless cameras in an autofocus showdown a few months back, and they slotted it into second place below the Lumix GH4 for its point-to-point single autofocusing capabilities and impressive 11 fps continuous shooting with tracking AF. Though I didn’t get to do much continuous shooting or tracking during the six days I had the camera, what I did see impressed me.

For example, during a wheelie barrow race at the Abergyolwyn Show, I was able to efficiently track one of the male contestants. My settings were as follows: continuous shooting (medium burst rate), AF-C, and tracking activated via the C2 custom button. For the first seven shots, the man (wearing a pink t-shirt) is in focus. Then, at the eighth shot, the tracking loses its focus and hops to the man standing in the background. However, it only takes a split second for the camera to regain the focus, and continue to track the man until the end of the first lap of the race.

In total, the camera fired off 23 consecutive shots (raw + JPG), at which point the buffer reached its limit for medium burst. (High burst can reach 49 consecutive JPG frames before it fills.) And it is here we have a significant limitation of the a6000–the limited buffer size. By the time the buffer had cleared, the second lap of the race had already finished, so I missed my subject tripping and flying over the finish line, probably the most important moment of the race!

Other high-end mirrorless cameras we own such as the OM-D E-M1 tend to have a better buffer size than the a6000, but they also have a higher price point, so essentially what you are getting with the a6000 is impressive autofocus and tracking sprinkled with a few compromises.

Something I should mention is that a faster memory card can help improve the write speed. Since I was only using a 16GB SDHC card with a write speed of 45MB per second, the rate was much slower than it would have been with a faster card. Shooting only JPGs would have helped as well.

These continuous tracking results are far from conclusive but they do give you an idea of how capable this camera is. To really put this camera to the test, it would be best to attend a high-speed sports event with the right lens, such as the FE 70-200mm f/4, as Gordon Laing did at the Tour de France.

As for single point autofocus, the a6000 is nothing short of impressive in normal daytime conditions. Once you find yourself in a low-light situation, however, you may notice that there is a slight lag between when you half-press the shutter button and when the camera actually focusses. A few times, I missed some tender moments between relatives at my cousin’s birthday, which took place in her darkly lit living room.

ILCE-6000, 1/60, f/ 3.5, ISO 1600
ILCE-6000, 1/60, f/ 3.5, ISO 1600

No compromise on image quality

Let me begin by saying that it is nearly impossible to fault the image quality of the Sony a6000.

ILCE-6000, 1/3200, f/ 18/10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/3200, f/ 1.8, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 4/1, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 4, ISO 200

On one hand, you have its 24MP sensor, which provides enough detail and sharpness for those who count their megapixels as if they were bars of gold, but not so much that the camera files become excessively large. The two examples below show you that even if you decide to drastically crop your image, it will retain enough detail to be used for small prints and online sharing. I don’t encourage cropping as doing so can ruin your original composition, especially in the case of wide-angle shots, but it is comforting to know that the a6000 files give you that option.

On the other, you have incredible dynamic range, realistic colours and excellent high ISO performance up to 12800. Even the JPG engine does a fine job in all conditions.

First, let’s touch upon dynamic range, as it is the aspect that impressed me the most. It is incredibly easy–perhaps too easy–to recuperate details in the shadows and highlights of any image. I have opened the shadows to +100 in Lightroom on a few images, and the result has always been satisfying with minimal noise and good retention of detail. Below are two examples where I completely opened the shadows in post production.

sony a6000 dynamic range
Before – ILCE-6000, 1/10, f/ 10, ISO 200
sony a6000 dynamic range
After – ILCE-6000, 1/10, f/ 10, ISO 200
sony a6000 dynamic range
Before – ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 5.6, ISO 200
sony a6000 dynamic range
After – ILCE-6000, 1/250, f/ 5.6, ISO 200

The same quality can be found when recuperating highlights as well, as you can see in the example below of the sunset where the sky is almost completely washed out in the original raw image. It is almost akin to working with an HDR image.

ILCE-6000, 1/25, f/ 16/1, ISO 200
Before – ILCE-6000, 1/25, f/ 16/1, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/25, f/ 16/1, ISO 200
After – ILCE-6000, 1/25, f/ 16/1, ISO 200

The Sony a6000 colours are equally as impressive as the dynamic range, almost always providing a true representation of the colours in a scene. The only exception is with files at very high ISOs (mainly 25600) where the loss in detail affects the overall vibrancy of the colours. I find the colours so trustworthy that I often found myself using the JPGs with the standard profile rather than the raw files, as they needed very little tweaking in evenly-lit situations where there weren’t too many dark shadows or bright highlights.

ILCE-6000, 1/3200, f/ 35/10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/3200, f/ 3.5, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/500, f/ 56/10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/500, f/ 5.6, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/800, f/ 28/10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/800, f/ 2.8, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/320, f/ 56/10, ISO 200
ILCE-6000, 1/320, f/ 5.6, ISO 200

Moving on to high ISO performance, the Sony a6000 does a good job of controlling noise up to 6400. In extreme circumstances, you can use 12800 ISO, but you will notice a significant deterioration in quality and excessive noise at the highest ISO speed of 25600. This is particularly true of the raw files, where data that Lightroom cannot recuperate takes on a purplish hue.

The JPG engine gives you three Noise Reduction (NR) options: Off, Low and Normal. By default, it is set to Normal but I feel the camera applies far too much noise reduction at this level, giving the images a mushy appearance even at 1600 and 3200 ISO. Optimal JPG results can be achieved with NR set to Off or Low depending on your personal preference. Below you can see three images taken at 12600 ISO with the different NR options activated:

, , f/ , ISO
Though I used the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens for much of my daytime testing, I ended up switching over to the FE 55mm f/1.8 (a lens for Sony’s full-frame mirrorless series) for much of my low-light shooting as the very fast aperture allowed me to keep my ISO to 1600 and 3200 and my shutter speed between 1/50 and 1/100.

Below you can see a series of images taken over the past six days in various low-light situations, from the Cor Meibion Dysynni male choir concert in a dark church and the local Cardiff fair to my cousin’s birthday party and the interiors of the houses at the pioneer village of St. Faggins.

Extra functionalities

WiFi and NFC functionalities are basically a given on new MILC cameras like the Sony a6000. Using the free Sony PlayMemories app, you can transfer JPGs onto your Android or iOs smartphone, or remotely control the camera with the Smart Remote app found in the App menu on-camera. There are also other apps you can download to the camera (some for a small fee) including Time Lapse, Facebook, Flickr and Multiple Exposure but the most essential apps are already installed. I’m personally not a huge fan of WiFi as I like playing with my raw files in post-production but it can be very useful at an event (such as a wedding or corporate function) where images have to be uploaded quickly and efficiently to the Web or social network.

The Panorama mode (found on the mode dial) is good fun for landscape images, though it may take a few tries to get the image right. If you sweep too quickly or slowly, a message will pop up on screen telling you to adjust your sweeping speed. Below is a quick panorama I took at the beach. As you can see, the camera managed to switch the image together nicely.

ILCE-6000, 1/100, f/ 6.3, ISO 100
ILCE-6000, 1/100, f/ 6.3, ISO 100 – Panorama Mode

For this particular review, I did not do any video shooting due to the limited time I had with the camera. However, the Sony a6000 specs say it all: high speed frame rates up to 60fps at full resolution, 1080p image, magnified focus assist that can be activated while recording, focus peaking, and zebra, all in a small mirrorless package. It may not be a Lumix GH4, which shoots 4K and has mic/headphone sockets, but it is certainly one of the best consumer cameras for video to date.

Using the FE 55mm f/1.8 on a Sony APS-C

While most of my shooting was done with the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 that was sent to me, I also used the FE 55mm f/1.8 for quite a few shots. The 55mm was actually designed for Sony’s full-frame mirrorless series but I enjoyed using it as a semi-telephoto portrait lens (82mm equivalent) on the a6000. Not only did it allow me to achieve a shallower depth of field than with the 18-55mm but it also made shooting in low-light conditions easier as I could choose a faster shutter speed and lower ISO.

thumb-up What I like about the Sony a6000

  • Light and compact
  • More attractive and less mechanical design compared to previous NEX cameras
  • Fast and accurate AF in tracking mode
  • Great image quality in terms of detail, sharpness, high ISO performance, dynamic range and colour
  • Wonderful viewfinder and handy tilting LCD screen
  • Works well as a video camera with 60fps, 1080p image, magnified focus assist, focus peaking, zebra and more

thumb-down What I don’t like about the Sony a6000

  • Loud shutter with no silent shutter option
  • A bit awkward to access tracking (Lock On AF), which is a shame as it is a prime feature of the a6000
  • A bit cumbersome to change AF point compared to its competitors
  • Limited buffer size
ILCE-7S, 1/100, f/ 28/10, ISO 100
Thanks for reading my review of the Sony a6000. Have any questions? Leave them in the comments section below!
List Price: $548.00
Current Price: $398.00
Buy Now
Price Disclaimer

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Heather Broster

Heather Broster was born in Canada, has lived in Japan and Italy but currently calls Wales home. She is a full-time gear tester at MirrorLessons. You can follow her on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Mathieu

    Hi Scott, the a6000 is certainly a great upgrade from the D90 regarding image quality and speed.
    As for the lenses, the sigma arts are excellent. You could find the kit lens a little bit limiting concerning the slow non constant aperture. Perhaps the 16-70mm f/4 or the 18-105mm f/4 could suit your needs better (but are more expensive). If you need very fast lenses, consider the 24mm f/1.8 or the 55mm FE 1.8.

  • Norman Shearer

    Nice, sensible review. There is little to be critical of with the A6000. The loud shutter is my biggest disappointment. Had it been quieter it could have become my favorite street camera. For portraiture eye AF is a neat feature. The lens selection for E-mount is getting better thankfully but still not as attractive as mft or Fuji. The Sigma trio of 19/30 and 60mm looks good for those on a budget, with perhaps legacy lenses filling in the gaps.

  • Claude B.

    So, It is look like to agree with that A6000 it is worth to get the best lens quality, like the Sony Zeiss?

  • Steve

    Found my way here – very interesting to read about the successor to my NEX-6, agree with the mechanical design bit although with my background that’s a plus! The loud shutter is also true and I’d like a silent mode. Need to max out my current camera first but it’s positive how Sony are taking this class of camera.

  • Heather

    Both are great. I personally own the E-M10 because I like having a wide choice of lenses, IBIS and a touch screen, but the a6000 is an excellent camera. The raw files and AF capabilities are outstanding. I’d try both in your local camera store, and see which feels better in your hands.

  • Joe

    what do you recommend ,e-m10 with IBIS or a6000 with bigger sensor?

  • bury pakath

    Well, thanks for your well intentioned, kind answer.
    It’s greatly appreciated.
    I’ve been shooting since the 80’s, and photography has always been for me the best way to tell a story with lenses, camera bodies, filters and gitzmos (You should see the collection of attachments I’ve hoarded over the years. Some I’ve never used)
    The photo stores became my candy stores. And what about cameras? The one who dies with more toys wins the race, yes!
    This must answer your wandering about me and the camera model that will best fit my needs. Well, most of my work is artistic & landscape, where a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 of a sec. is not needed, but I used to own a Nikon FM4…
    The Titanium shutter blades didn’t make a better photographer out of me.
    We’ve become camera hoarders.
    Then again, wasn’t that a pleasure to be the first kid on the block to own a 14 speed bike?
    Thanks for the elementary differences you’ve pointed that set the A6000 and the RX1 apart.
    I guess my best choice will be the RX10.
    Thanks for your time.
    Thanks for sharing.
    Have a great day!

  • pjn

    Since Heather’s not answering, let me, another Canadian answer. Bury, you’re comparing two vastly different cameras without ever mentioning what kind of photography you do. I own a Sony a99, a900 and an RX100m3, which has the same sensor as the RX10. The quality of the RX100 raw files is shocking they’re so good. They can’t be cropped like my a99 or shoot at higher than ISO3200 without a lot of processing, but if all you do is post to the web and print at Costco the occasional 13*19 max, you won’t see much difference.

    As much as I love my a99 for low light when I shoot at my church or concert or reporting assignments, I’m never taking it on a trip again, the weight is too much. The RX100 convinced me the RX10 might be the way to go for trips. Remember it is weather resistant and the a6000 is not.

    As to sensor size, it can be a bit of a mug’s game. If you can’t shoot interesting photos with what you have, bigger sensors won’t increase your skills. Have you maxed out what you can do with what you have?

    Which brings up what you didn’t say: what kind of photography do you practice? Just what do you want to do with either camera? Once you’ve figured that out you’ll know what to get. One is fixed lens the other interchangeable. If you need ultra-wide, it’s the a6000, and if a 24-200 is all you shoot, consider the RX10. Also the 18-135 is a very slow, large consumer lens and not a competitor to the RX10 fixed lens. You’d have to get the 16-70 F4 to compare.

    Best wishes on your photographic journey.

  • bury pakath

    Dear Heather,
    Thanks for your meat & potatoes, down to earth presentation.
    I’m ogling this camera and fighting my demons to choose between the A6000 and the now reduced price RX10.
    My main concern is image quality. I’m a sensor size biased guy.
    On the other hand I’ve heard comments that the kit zoom provided with this camera does not give justice to its sensor quality.
    Some say that the 18-105 G-Series gives a better image quality.
    Can you please give me your kind opinion on those two matters, please?
    1- Best buy between the two camera models
    2- Bets zoom?
    Thanks, and keep on sharing!

  • Heather

    I’d very much like to review the a5000 in the future. I hope you’re enjoying yours!

  • Heather

    The GH4 is an excellent camera, I agree, but it is hard to justify spending the money unless you plan to use it for work. The a6000 would complement your Nikons nicely. I really had to nitpick to come up with some negative points.

  • Tonypet

    Hi Heather,

    Thank you for sharing your review. Been thinking of saving up on this camera to compliment the bulkiness of my D7000 and D7100 and its lenses. Likewise, I think the faster continuous shots of 11 fps could cover the shortcomings of my Nikons. It may have some cons as mentioned, which perhaps I could get along with. The price of a unit goes along with its features, anyway. The GH4 is quite in a lead though as reported in the camera store tv website, and as mentioned, the price is quite heavy. Regards.

  • Lawrence

    Sony is great – until it breaks -and then the nightmares begin be it their cameras or their computers. As much as I like some of their cameras (the new FF mirror less especially), not being able to trust Sony regarding repairs and support is a big negative.

  • M. Lewis

    I enjoyed your review of the Sony A6000 I learned a lot about the pros and cons of the camera. Perhaps you could review the A5000 which is the camera I have just bought. I did not have enough money for the A6000 but I hope that the pictures are almost as good.
    Many thanks

  • Heather

    I’m pleased to hear that the buffer size is better with a faster memory card. As for the AF-A mode with zone focus, I’ll try that the next time I get my hands on the camera. (There should be another Sony event sometime later this year where they provide demo models.) Many thanks. Heather

  • chris

    A great review I have an A6000 coming from a Nikon d800 I agree about the ability to move the focus spot.
    The lock on AF can be triggered with the shutter so as you focus the camera locks on. I however found the af-a focus mode with zone focus setting to work very well, I shot 4500 frames of motorbike racing recently and the camera missed very few shots I was using the Sony 70-200 lens.
    With the fastest memory card I had no issue with buffer size at the motor racing. For my normal landscapes shot buffer size is not an issue.

    Regards Chris.

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owners of this website, Heather Broster and Mathieu Gasquet, are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, eBay Partner Network, Macphun Affiliate Program, Peak Design Affiliate Program, The Inspired Eye Affiliate Program, SmugMug Affiliate Program and Mediterranean Photo Tours Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay, Macphun, Peak Design, The Inspired Eye, SmugMug and Mediterranean Photo Tours properties properties. They are also members of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.