src=" Two Weeks in the Balkans with the Fujinon XF 16-55mm F2.8 - Guest Post by Ugo Cei - MirrorLessons - The Best Mirrorless Camera Reviews
Guest Post

Date: 03/09/2015 | By: Mathieu

Two Weeks in the Balkans with the Fujinon XF 16-55mm F2.8 – Guest Post by Ugo Cei

, , f/ , ISO

Two Weeks in the Balkans with the Fujinon XF 16-55mm F2.8 – Guest Post by Ugo Cei

Two weeks, five countries and more than 3,000km.

I had been planning this trip for months: a long drive from Italy, across Slovenia, and down along the Dalmatian coast of Croatia into Montenegro, with a side trip to Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, all places that I had been wanting to visit for years, but that (aside from a short trip to Croatia last year) I had never set foot onto.

As the date of departure approached, I started thinking about getting a new lens. During previous trips with my Fujifilm X system, I had used a combination of the 10-24mm F4, the 35mm F1.4, and the 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 lenses. All very fine lenses, but without much coverage of the essential, for travel photography, middle range of focal lengths. If I wanted anything longer than 24mm and wider than 55mm, I would have to use the 35mm and zoom with my feet and, generally, do a bit too much lens-jockeying.

So I resolved to get myself a midrange zoom, which either meant the 18-55mm F2.8-4 or the new 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR. I am sure that, aside from the extra 2mm on the wide end and the extra stop of light on the long end, the 18-55mm would have been just as good, but when I saw the price difference between the two, I decided to go for the more expensive 16-55mm.

For about 300€ more I could get those two more millimeters (the difference between 16mm and 18mm is actually more than one might think), a fixed maximum aperture, weather sealing, superior autofocus performance and, supposedly, the very best optical quality.

On the negative side, I would have had to give up optical image stabilization and carry around more weight and bulk. Of the two, only the former really worried me. In the end, since I could afford those 300€ more, I bought the 16-55mm and this was the lens I used for almost all the photos I took during the trip. It was just so convenient that it mostly stayed bolted onto my camera most of the time.

What follows are some postcards from the locations we visited, along with some impressions about the usage of the lens and how it behaved in various situations. This is not meant to be a comprehensive review in any way.

Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina

This scene presented itself in front of my eyes and I couldn’t resist shooting it, taking care to underexpose it in order to silhouette the minaret and maintain good detail in the clouds. Feel free to read any meaning you like into this one.

1/3200s at f/8, ISO 200, 55mm.


Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina

I had to leave my friends sitting at the dinner table and run down to the river bank to get this classic view of the Stari Most, the Old Bridge, but I knew I only had one chance.

14s at f/8, ISO 200, 16mm on a tripod.


Kotor, Montenegro

Kotor, Montenegro

You take the road from Kotor to Cetinje and, after 25 hairpin turns on a road where you have to throw your car almost against the stone parapet or into the ditch every time you meet another car coming down, you reach the most incredible viewpoint overlooking the Boka Kotorska, with a view that encompasses the whole bay, reaching as far as the Croatian coast and the open Adriatic sea.

Nine stitched vertical shots at 1/100s  at f/8, ISO 400, 19mm.


Dubrovnik, Croatia

Dubrovnik, Croatia

How do you avoid the huge throngs that invade Dubrovnik in the summer and get great light at the same time? Easy, you get up at sunrise, get your shots and return to the hotel at 7AM, in time for breakfast. Forget about doing it any other way.

HDR obtained from three shots at 1/640ss, 1/320s and 1/160s at f/8, ISO 200, 21mm. 


Dubrovnik, Croatia

Why would one get an f/2.8 lens, if not for the bokeh? Here I was a bit too far from my subject (this is just a candid, stolen portrait, after all) to really throw the background off focus, but I like keeping just the right amount of context. If you want bokeh, with this lens you can have plenty.

1/4,000s at f/2.8, ISO 200, 55mm.


Hvar Island, Croatia

Jagodna Bay, Hvar, Croatia

I was lucky enough to catch this stunning sunset over the Jagodna bay. All the colors of the rainbow in a single image.

HDR obtained from three shots at 1/25s, 1/12s and 1/6s at f/8, ISO 200, 16mm.


Hvar, Croatia

Hvar in the summer is a bustling city, with a constant traffic of boats going back and forth between the harbor and the Pakleni islands in front, where they had parties going on all night long. From the walls of the castle overlooking the town, they all look like toy boats.

8s at f/8, ISO 200, 20mm.


Plitvice Lakes, Croatia

Plitvice Lakes, Croatia

Photographing the Plitvice Lakes National Park is not easy. The biggest visual attraction is the huge number of waterfalls, which call for exposures a few seconds long, requiring the use of a tripod. Unfortunately, you can’t just put down your tripod wherever you want, as the public is mostly forced to walk along narrow paths and wooden walkways. The place can also be horribly crowded in summer.

1/80s at f/4, ISO 800, 50mm.


Plitvice Lakes, Croatia

The solution is once again to show up as soon as possible (the park opens at 8.30AM) before the big groups arrive and be inventive. In some cases, I sat down on the edge of the walkway, with the legs of the tripod in the shallow water. If the weather is horrible, with grey skies, cold temperatures and a chance of rain, rejoice: many people will stay away and the light will just be perfect. If the sun is out, better leave the camera at the hotel.

2s at f/11, ISO 200, 50mm.


Rovinj, Croatia

Rovinj, Croatia

Dubrovnik and Trogir are very popular and therefore overrun with crowds of aimlessly wandering tourists, but Rovinj (or Rovigno, if you prefer the Italian toponym) is just as charming and not as packed. Being on a peninsula jutting out into the sea, it affords great views from two sides: north and south.

HDR obtained from three shots at 3s, 6s and 12s at f/8, ISO 200, 17mm.


Zadar, Croatia

Zadar, Croatia

I was worried that, lacking optical image stabilization, hand-holding the 16-55mm at slow shutter speeds would have proven difficult, but employing the proper technique helps a lot.

1/30s at f/2.8, ISO 6400, 23mm.


I had great expectations from the Fujinon 16-55mm F2.8 and I must say it managed to even surpass them. It is an ode to sharpness, the colors and contrast are excellent, and the bokeh is smooth. I made no attempt to evaluate distortions or aberrations, as those can be easily corrected anyway.

I won’t say much about auto-focus performance and accuracy. As you can see, most of my subjects are quite static, so they tend to pose very few problems in the AF department. All I can say is that focusing always seemed to me to be snappy and accurate.

Make no mistake, the lens is quite bulky, when compared to the other Fuji zooms, but a constant f/2.8 maximum aperture requires a good amount of glass. On the X-E2 with an additional hand-grip, it feels quite balanced. If you are worried about carrying it around your neck for long hours, get a sling strap, like my BlackRapid, which makes carrying every camera a breeze.

As for the Balkans, I had great expectations about them as well and they too didn’t disappoint. Visually amazing and varied places, nice people, and great food. I am seriously considering adding a tour of the Dalmatian coast to the list of our Mediterranean Photo Tours offerings, in addition to the ones we already do in Greece and Italy.

Ugo Cei is a travel, landscape and fine art photographer from Italy. A geek at heart, he loves the technical aspects of digital photography and understanding what goes inside the machine. His clients include Architectural Digest, Condé Nast Traveler, and Alitalia.

You can find more information about Ugo’s work and his workshops on his official website. You can also follow him on FacebookGoogle+, Twitter and Youtube.

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Mathieu Gasquet

Mathieu Gasquet is a professional photographer with French and Italian origins. Besides running his own video and photography studio 3Dit Lab, he is also the official photographer for the National Cinema Museum in Turin. You can follow him on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Ugo Cei

    I love UWs and I am planning to still use my 10-24mm a lot. I didn’t use it much for this trip, mostly because the 16-55mm was such a novelty and I wanted to exploit it to the max, but both the 10-24mm and the 55-200mm are going to see much use in the future, I am sure.

  • Ugo Cei

    Well, for one thing, I sometimes like to go wider than 28 or longer than 112. And I think the X30 has some limitations when it comes to long exposures. Aside from that, I think it’s a super nice camera for walking around.

  • David

    Can’t beat my Fuji X30 with its fast F2-2.8 28-112 equivalent lens. Yes, I know it’s a smaller sensor but people forget these sensors get better, too, with time. And it’s pro-focus mode creates all the bokah I need for static portraits. I make more money with this camera than when I was using full frame in the past. Customers are preferring the “painterly” look from these files over the extreme sharpness of the larger sensor. 16×20 inch prints are looking fab especially with fractal adjustments made in post processing. Why carry an anvil around ones neck in 2015 when one can carry a tiny, marvelous gem of a camera with all the creative controls one can imagine!

  • Carl Leck

    Ugo, thanks for the review. I currently travel with the 14mm, 18-55mm, 55-200mm, and 35mm. I was thinking about getting the 10-24mm and eliminate the 14mm and 18-55mm. I agree that for me, there is a big difference between 16mm and 18mm. I’m curious how often you felt you needed to go wider than the 16mm and used the 10-24mm. What conclusions did you reach on your travel kit?

  • Ugo Cei

    Thank you Michael.

  • Ugo Cei

    Thanks Katarina.

  • Katarina Tomekova

    I like this post, thank you for sharing with us. I don’t own Fuji camera but I enjoyed reading descriptions of the places, some of them I visited many years ago, when there still was “Yugoslavia”.

  • Michael

    Very nice photos & fuji colours

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owners of this website, Heather Broster and Mathieu Gasquet, are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, eBay Partner Network, Macphun Affiliate Program, Peak Design Affiliate Program, The Inspired Eye Affiliate Program, SmugMug Affiliate Program and Mediterranean Photo Tours Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay, Macphun, Peak Design, The Inspired Eye, SmugMug and Mediterranean Photo Tours properties properties. They are also members of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.