src=" Sony and its frequent camera releases: is it positive or negative? - MirrorLessons - The Best Mirrorless Camera Reviews
Mirrorless Musings

Date: 20/10/2016 | By: Mathieu

Sony and its frequent camera releases: is it positive or negative?


Sony and its frequent camera releases: is it positive or negative?

The announcement of the new Sony a6500 has generated a mix of excitement and controversy about the company’s aggressive strategy. While some have praised the giant Japanese corporation for constantly evolving, others have become bitter about the frequent camera releases. Why? Because it is frustrating to think that what you just bought yesterday has been replaced by a more advanced version today, and will probably lose its value very quickly as a result.

Is Sony’s dynamic strategy a positive or negative thing for the market and its customers? Let’s try to answer this by analysing a few different topics.

Ethics statement: All opinions expressed in this article are our own. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission that helps to support this site. Don’t worry – prices remain the same for you. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thank you!

Two cameras instead of one

The a6300 announced in March 2016 was a relevant step forward in comparison to the a6000, released in February 2014 (a two-year gap). Sony added 4K video, more advanced functionalities, a new sensor, a faster autofocus system (the best in the E-mount line-up), better continuous shooting speeds and a more robust body with weatherproofing.

sony a6300 vs a6000
The a6300 and a6000

The a6500 comes 8 months after the a6300 and this short gap surprised us all. The new camera adds some features that many users were expecting on the a6300 in the first place.

We finally have a touch sensitive rear screen, a feature that the entry-level a5100 had kept for itself up until now. Then we have 5-axis stabilisation which is a first for an APS-C E-mount camera but has been successfully implemented on the A7 II series before. Other additions include an upgraded sensor with an LSI chip that increases the buffer capabilities and the High ISO quality but it’s safe to say that touch sensitivity and in-body stabilisation are the two main upgrades that customers were demanding. They also included a new setting to fix the overheating issue that affects many a6300 samples.

sony a6500
5-axis stabilisation on the a6500

This could lead us to think that Sony listens to feedback and as a result, released a new camera to fulfill these requests. But the question is: couldn’t they have waited a little longer to release an a6300/a6500 with all the features of the latter? The request for a touch screen has been around for ages and was mentioned in many reviews including ours.

With 5-axis stabilisation, it was easy to predict that users would ask for it after seeing how effective it is for the FE system. When the a6300 came out, we first thought that the body was too small to implement it but then Sony managed to re-design the shutter mechanism in order to accommodate the IBIS mechanism as you can see in the slide below taken from the a6500 press event.


Honestly, this doesn’t come as a surprise: Sony has proved in the past to be very capable of integrating lots of complex hardware into smaller bodies (think about the RX100 series and the built-in EVF).

In a way, it does feel as if Sony rushed to get the first camera out, only to follow up with a second, more “complete” package.

Perhaps the overheating fix could be one of the most important improvements as far as real-world use for video is concerned but it could also reinforce what I just said above: the a6300 wasn’t 100% ready to be released.

sony a6000 series
The a6000 family

However we can analyse the story from an another point of view: having only the a6000 and a high-end model like the a6500 would have created a substantial price gap. The a6000 has been very successful because of the perfect balance between quality and affordability, so I’m not sure users would have been happy to see a jump of almost $900. So instead, Sony decided to keep all three models on the market: a6000, a6300 and a6500. Together they form the a6000 series with three different “logically spaced” price points. In other words, today customers have more choice.

Same body, new specs

A second question can be: is the a6500 worth the extra money in comparison to the a6300? We’ve demonstrated many times the advantage of in-body stabilisation here on MirrorLessons and a touch screen is definitely useful. So I would be tempted to say “yes” while I wait to see how much better the buffer and low-light capabilities are.

sony a6300 vs a6500
The a6300 looks identical to the a6500 except for the more prominent grip
and an extra C button on the newest camera.

However I can’t help but wonder: why didn’t Sony take the opportunity to update the design of the a6500 in addition to specifications?

Yes, there is slightly more substantial grip and an additional custom button but if this really is the flagship model, I would have loved to see other features like: more dials on top to control exposure more quickly, and a larger body that doesn’t compromise the compactness of the system but could have introduced a dual SD card slot (accessible via a robust door on the side instead of the bottom) and a larger battery. A dedicated AF Joystick on the rear would have been another welcome addition.

The feeling is once again that we have a camera that lacks a few things, which is the same impression I had when Heather and I reviewed the a6300. Sony listens to customers but they seem to filter requests and prioritise technological advancements above all. They don’t ignore the other feedback completely – the overheating fix is the latest proof – but they can be slow to respond. Yes, we (finally!) have a new menu interface but my first impression is that too little has changed.

The new menu system

What is clear about Sony’s strategy is this: they like to maintain the same camera body and update the technology inside it. We can find multiple examples: the Nex 6/7 and now a6000 series has maintained more or less the same design with small upgrades and even a few downgrades (Tri-Navi anyone?). The RX100 series is even more interesting because Sony has maintained the same pocketable size while including things like a pop-up EVF.

To be fair, most camera companies maintain a very similar design throughout multiple generations. Sony isn’t doing any different but I do believe their cameras need a little more work than others. Care for the smallest details often, if not always, makes for a better camera. Fujifilm learned this with the X-T1 and made the appropriate changes on the X-T2.

We could argue that a larger body would bring the camera closer to the A7 series and that might be true. But I am sure some changes can be made without compromising this aspect too much (again, Sony is the master of incorporating as much as possible into a small body). Furthermore, when you see some of the promo images for the new camera, you may start to think that a slightly larger body may not be a bad idea.

A6500 promo image with the 24-70mm f/2.8 G Master lens

I’ve reviewed the lens above and it’s exceptional but definitely not designed for such a small body. Sony wants to show that its FE products are 100% compatible with its APS-C bodies but to me it reinforces one of the biggest limits of this camera and the APS-C E-mount system in general: the choice of quality lenses is more limited than with the FE system. Some full-frame lenses like the 70-200mm f/4 can work very well on the a6000 series but others are simply too large and heavy.

Getting used to the new naming scheme

I explained that the a6000 series comprises three cameras that in order of importance go as follows:

  • a6000 < a6300 < a6500.

Then we have the a5000 and a5100 that make up the a5000 series which is an entry-level segment. (The a6000 series is the mid / advanced line-up.) There is also an a3000 series, by the way, which is a cheap DSLR-style model that has now been discontinued in some countries.

Those following the E-mount system since the beginning know that Sony used to call its APS-C mirrorless series NEX. We had Nex 3, Nex 5, Nex 6 and Nex 7 and each segment received different updates, sometimes very minor but the organisation was clearer.

The Nex-3n

It gets confusing when we try to categorise the new cameras by referring to the old naming style.

We could associated the a3000 series to the old Nex 3, though the design is completely different. The a5000 series is the old Nex 5, although the a5000 model feels closer to a Nex 3 in terms of specifications and price. The a6000 series is similar to the Nex 6 but what about the Nex 7, which was the old flagship model: has it been replaced by the a6500 or will there be something else? Having just a number instead of 4 for each camera was less confusing. Until you saw the arrival of a Nex 8, or Nex 7 mark II, you knew there wasn’t a replacement for the flagship model.

The Sony Nex 7

With the new naming scheme and Sony’s dynamic and often unpredictable strategy, it is difficult to be sure if the a6500 will remain the flagship model.

Perhaps a small hint is that the official a6500 press release mentions the word “flagship” while it didn’t for the a6300 eight months ago. But that doesn’t mean the brand can’t change its mind later on. We can always stop comparing the new names to the old ones and just accept that the E-mount system has evolved in a different direction but that nagging doubt will still remain: will the family expand to include an a6700, a6900 or a7000 in the (near) future?

This final point can confuse customers who may decide to wait for the next iteration or for prices to drop when the next camera is announced. There is often this feeling of “should I buy now or should I wait?”. I guess the best answer is to stop thinking about what the future holds, see what is currently available and decided if it’s enough for your needs (in most cases, it is). Still, I can understand the frustration if something you bought a month ago suddenly gets “downgraded” by something new that has more features and fixes the issues of the camera you just bought.

Kumamoto earthquake, market sales and multiple systems

Another valid point is the recent Kumamoto earthquake and how difficult it was to buy a Sony camera in the several months following the disaster, including the a6300. I also heard that some shops ordered a larger quantity of cameras to be sure to accommodate customer demands.

However the question that arises now is: will enough people still buy the a6300 or will they wait for the a6500? And in that case, will the shops be able to sell the leftover a6300 samples easily? The answer to this will probably vary from country to county, and from market to market. For example the European price is more expensive than the US price and that might not help.

What is important to remember is that the digital camera market in general is not doing well. Sony is obviously benefiting from its strategy because it’s the mirrorless brand that sells the most. In some European countries they’ve even surpassed DSLR sales (according to Sony, February 2016). Sony also said at the recent Photokina press conference that their interchangeable lens camera business has been growing over the past three years, unlike the worldwide digital imaging market that is decreasing.

Another thing to consider is that Sony currently has two main systems (full frame and APS-C), in addition to their compact camera and smart camera ranges. They are still developing new A-mount cameras like the recent a99 II presented at Photokina a few weeks ago (although the most exciting specifications are often seen in mirrorless cameras). So by producing more cameras, Sony obviously sells more and I am really glad they do, otherwise it would be worrying!

However when you have so many cameras, it becomes difficult for customers to understand which they should choose.

Think about A-mount users: while new E-mount cameras were sprouting like mushrooms, the A-mount system barely saw an upgrade in the past two years. These users could have started to think that the brand was abandoning the DSLT system and had begun to switch over to the E-system, something encouraged by Sony itself since the AF of several of these cameras is compatible with A-mount lenses. Then suddenly a new a99 II appeared. Don’t get me wrong; it’s great news for A-mount users but I wish Sony were clearer in its communication. To be fair, some Sony managers stated in interviews that they were fully committed to the A-mount system but other official sources also gave contradictory responses like this one.

Comparison to other brands: does Sony really not care?

The a6500 topic has also generated some comparisons with other brands and one in particular: Fujifilm. While Sony was announcing its new APS-C camera, Fujifilm released a number of firmware updates for new and old cameras as well as its lenses. Many praised the care Fujifilm has for its customers, even those who own a 4-years-old product like the X-Pro1. Undeniably, this is a good strategy to grow a group of faithful customers.

But let’s have a look at Sony and its firmware updates:

  • A7r II (current firmware is 3.30, released in August 2016): among the interesting features introduced since the camera was released, we find uncompressed RAW (requested by customers).
  • A7 II (current firmware is 3.20, September 2016): among the various updates we find uncompressed RAW and phase detection compatibility with DSLR lenses (requested by customers).
  • a6000 (current firmware is 3.20, July 2016): among various things, they included the ability to record XAVC S video to SDHC cards (less expensive than SDXC cards).

There are many other updates designed to improve the AF, image quality, start-up time, and compatibility with new lenses and accessories.

So yes, we can argue that Sony’s firmware updates are not as rich as some Fuji updates but they are there and they are recent.

Certainly the brand concentrates more on certain models than others, with the first generation of A7 cameras having received less than the second, but it does show that Sony is making an effort. They also seem happy to address some of the long term demands (uncompressed RAW and a new menu system are two examples). For now however, they don’t excel in this department in comparison to other brands. I quoted Fujifilm but I could highlight the efforts of Olympus (the OM-D E-M1 is a perfect example) and Pansonic seems to have improved lately too.

This doesn’t mean the other brands are perfect and they too release products that confuse customers more than anything else (Fuji X-E2s anyone?).


So, is Sony’s strategy good or bad? My two cents is that it’s not terrible but it can definitely improve: I feel that the company should slow down, pay more attention to the usability of their cameras and small details instead of mainly prioritising the technical side.

I definitely like the technological evolution that each camera brings and it’s true that there is more choice. It’s nice to see some requested features finally being integrated onto the new model and it’s reassuring to buy a camera knowing that it has the best sensor on the market and that the brand is a leader in that department.

At the same time, I wish Sony would focus more actively on making their cameras great not just in terms of image quality, autofocus performance and 4K video but also everything else. I review many cameras and I can say that holding an X-T2, an E-M1/II or a Lumix G85 feels better than a Sony camera.

This doesn’t mean I don’t like Sony cameras. We own two (A7r II and a6300) and have used them many times with satisfaction and great results. Even though the interface is not great, you learn to customise it in the best way you can. But because I review cameras for a living, I can’t just quote press releases if I think there is room for improvement, and in this case, I think there is.

I’ve written this many times, and I will say it again. If Sony can improve the aspects I mentioned above, I am sure they can become a very powerful brand in the digital camera industry.

Additional read:

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter!

About the author: Mathieu Gasquet

Mathieu Gasquet is a professional photographer with French and Italian origins. Besides running his own video and photography studio 3Dit Lab, he is also the official photographer for the National Cinema Museum in Turin. You can follow him on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Claude B.

    I’ll stay with my philosophy with buying very good lens and can stil use the for A6000, A6300, A6500 , etc… without loosing to much value.

  • Mathieu

    Nope, but I’ll be in a warmer location soon enough :)

  • Lacknafta

    It’s a well written article.

    I think being at the forefront of the technical evolution is their thing. If they were to slow down and spend resources on trying to become more like the competition who knows if they’d be able to keep the pedal to the metal in terms innovative technology and then where’d they be?

    In regards to sensors having a relatively good one is certainly a boon, where ‘relative’ is more what you are used to than what the competition is doing. And in regards to sensor competition…hey Sony..

  • Scott

    Great article … as always, really enjoy your insights. Now a bit off topic; are you guys in Iceland for the new camera roll out festivities?!? I hope 😉

  • Alan Paone

    that makes sense

  • dustin4931

    Great commentary, Mathieu.I wholeheartedly agree with your final assessment.

  • Turbofrog

    I have heard that the A6300 was originally scheduled for release back in Summer 2015, but was badly delayed for some reason or other. So I suspect the new systems for the A6500 were simply being developed in parallel and happened to be completed on schedule…

  • Alan Paone

    that’s true until they hit 7000, sometime next year at this rate, but they’ll rejigger the whole lineup by then i guess. i can’t help but wonder which of these two was the rushed one, were they planning the 6500 and pushed out the 6300 to quickly compete with the x-pro, or did they move up the 6500 to make up for something about the 6300.

  • Kasim

    Well I wouldn’t bet that Sony knows what they are doing. It’s not like they killed their Notebooks Vaio, or what about their Smartphones, that’s an other troubled market. Sony is doing a lot of stuff, and just because of that I wouldn’t say they know what they are doing.
    They had Walkman end where is that brand now?

  • Turbofrog

    Well, isn’t that sort of exactly what they’ve done?

    The A6500 is strictly better than the A6300 in every way, which is strictly better than the A6000 in every way. But you can still buy those older cameras for much less money.

    Watch the bottom fall out of the A6300 resale market, though. I think a lot of its buyers really wanted an A6500 but gave up in disgust and got the A6300 when it was clear that Sony wasn’t going to give them IBIS or a touchscreen. Oops.

  • Immo Paulsen

    For me, the 6500 is what the 6300 was supposed to be. Arguably the best APS-C camera from the feature side, with advanced video capabilities and IBIS – if you leave ergonomics or design preferences aside. For me, the main issue is the lack of a clear structure for the customer in Sony’s APS-C E mount line. The A7 series are well structured – sensitivity, resolution, and the allrounder in the middle. To follow the logic here is way more tricky.

  • Mathieu

    Yes. a68 and a99 II this year, nothing in 2015, a77 II in 2014, a58 in 2013.

  • emersonik

    I think Sony use their customers as Guinea pigs by launching too many products and (what is worse) too many incompatible systems.

  • Alan Paone

    It’s odd to me that they haven’t adopted a strategy like the rx100 line, where older models stick around to fill in lower price points. 6500, 6300, 6000, 5100 , etc is reasonably clear (until a 5600 shows up thats better that a 6300 or something), but mk 3,4,5 is way easier for a consumer to understand.

  • Bremer

    I thought The Sony a68 was released this year…..

  • Turbofrog

    “Maybe having a ‘photographic history’ counts for something after all.”

    Perhaps, though it always amazes me how Panasonic can get so much right in their user interface (infuriating Auto ISO limitations aside!) despite introducing their first cameras in just 2001. Though I guess they have always had that collaboration with Leica, in whatever capacity…

  • Benevine Santiago

    I agree with your sentiments. I have used Sony cameras, and while they’re okay, their corporate strategy has been a disincentive for me to invest in their system again. The frequency with which they release their camera iterations suggests they don’t feel they have to get it right (and on that sort of time crunch, they can’t be expected to); they can just “fix” things with the next release. And while firmware updates are one thing, not every feature omission or performance issue can be fixed via firmware.

    It’s quite a shame because I _want_ to like them more. The A99 II seems compelling, and I still have nice Minolta G glass that I would love to put on it. But I don’t wonder if there are just better or more pragmatic choices for a full frame DSLR style camera body.

    In the meantime, I’m getting a lot more joy and performance out of my m43 bodies than I ever did with my A77.

  • PinkTerror

    Small, Medium, Large. Basic, Intermediate, Advanced. Good, Better, Best. It’s just Marketing. And Sony knows what they’re doing – they sell a lot more than just cameras. The people complaining about the strategy with the 6500 are 5% Sony users who want the latest and greatest, and 95% trolls and reviewers who don’t even buy Sony products.

  • soundimageplus

    Very much agree with your conclusions and part of the reason I don’t use Sony anymore. It’s difficult to find fault with their technological advances, while at the same time difficult to find much to praise for the design and handling of most of their cameras. Maybe having a ‘photographic history’ counts for something after all.

  • Michael

    A rather positive outlook on the topic. Many of the features affecting usability don’t seem to have changed at all, thought I haven’t yet seen an actual a6500 yet myself. Neither has the lenses dedicated for the aps-c Sonys. Perhaps it’s the downsides of the a6300 that make the timing seem so much worse & easier to knock Sony.The relative position of Fuji compared to the rest in technical performance meant those updates they had to come out with. Given the excellent XT2 those technical & usability issues too , will Fuji feel they same need to update?? We’ll see.
    Finally on price , the nex 6 could be bought new soon after release with the 16-50 for Au$ 636, a stunningly low price indeed even if very few sites thought much of the lens. The a6300 & a6500 so far haven’t even come close to representing the same bang for buck, as it is , it’s there in range of most competitor systems including dslrs which have far more extensive lens choices.

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owners of this website, Heather Broster and Mathieu Gasquet, are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, eBay Partner Network, Macphun Affiliate Program, Peak Design Affiliate Program, The Inspired Eye Affiliate Program, SmugMug Affiliate Program and Mediterranean Photo Tours Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay, Macphun, Peak Design, The Inspired Eye, SmugMug and Mediterranean Photo Tours properties properties. They are also members of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.