src=" Comparing the Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm vs 45mm – MirrorLessons

Date: 29/10/2015 | By: Heather

Comparing two M.Zuiko portrait lenses – Olympus 45mm f/1.8 vs. 75mm f/1.8

olympus 75mm vs 45mm

Comparing two M.Zuiko portrait lenses – Olympus 45mm f/1.8 vs. 75mm f/1.8

Two portrait lenses that every Micro Four Thirds photographer has considered at some point are the M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8 and M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8.

The 45mm has been in our collection for almost as long as this website has been online. It was the second lens we bought after picking up our first mirrorless camera, the Olympus OM-D E-M5, and has proven a steadfast companion thanks to its quality and compactness. It was later joined by the 75mm, which proved a boon for Mathieu’s event photography, as he often had to photograph actors and directors in poorly lit auditoriums and conference halls.

The 45mm and 75mm are similar in that they meet all the requirements for a good portrait lens – a fast aperture, long focal length, sharp rendering and pleasant bokeh –  but there are also a few key differences that could influence your decision to purchase one or the other. Let’s have a look at them both now!

Build and Design

The most notable differences between the M.Zuiko 45mm and 75mm lie in their build and design.

DMC-GX8, 1/30, f/ 11/5, ISO 800
DMC-GX8, 1/30, f/ 11/5, ISO 800

Size and Weight

Though the metal-like finish may deceive you into thinking that the lens is all-metal, most of the 45mm’s exterior is made of plastic. This, coupled with its compact dimensions and a weight of only 115g, gives you an extremely portable and lightweight prime that you can easily pop into your camera bag or jacket pocket at the last minute.

By comparison, the 75mm is anything but light and compact. It weighs 305g, is nearly twice the size of the 45mm, and features a all-metal build. However, where the 75mm lacks in compactness, it makes up in durability. Indeed, the 45mm has far more signs of physical wear and tear on the body than the 75mm, even though we’ve owned and used both for a similar length of time.

Physical Controls and Characteristics

As far as physical controls go, the two lenses are quite similar. Neither has an aperture ring, nor a physical distance scale but they do share a ribbed focus ring that focuses by wire. Olympus produced a metal lens hood for the 75mm and a plastic lens hood for the 45mm, both of which must be purchased separately. Neither lens is weather-sealed nor optically stabilised.

Image Quality – Through the lens

Though both the 45mm and 75mm fall into the “portrait lens” category, they actually have very different equivalent focal lengths in full-frame format. The 45mm is a 90mm equivalent, which is close to the classic focal length of 80-85mm, while the 75mm equates to a telephoto prime at 150mm. The latter is often used by professionals for its ability to compress perspective and isolate the subject from the background.

Budget aside, the lens that you choose should depend on the kind of photography you plan to do. If you are just getting into portrait photography and like the idea of taking a variety of portraits, from head shots to full upper-body shots, the 45mm would be your best bet. If you are a more experienced portrait photographer, the 75mm is a must-have for tight head shots and photographing people at a distance at weddings and events.


One of the biggest concerns of portrait photographers is the sharpness of the lens. Thankfully, both the M.Zuiko 45mm and 75mm perform very well even at their fastest aperture of f/1.8 and are therefore perfectly suited to the genre.

To see high resolution images taken with both lenses, please visit our full reviews:

M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8 Full Review | M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 Full Review

In the comparative test shots I took, I found discovered the following:

At the fastest aperture of f/1.8…

There isn’t a very big difference in performance at the centre, though the 75mm does seem marginally sharper. At the edges, the 75mm is noticeably sharper but the performance is still very good from both lenses.

Between f/2.8 and f/8…

The sharpness from both lenses improves at the centre after the fastest aperture. Both are already tack sharp from f/2.8 onward and peak at around f/5.6.

Though the 75mm is definitely sharper than the 45mm at the centre at all apertures, the difference is less noticeable than in the corners where the 75mm is much sharper than the 45mm throughout the range. Once again, peak performance occurs at around f/5.6 in the corners.

From f/11 onward…

Diffraction begins to set in at around f/11, which is common for Micro Four Thirds lenses, but images remain useable up to f/16. As always, the 75mm remains sharper than the 45mm but the differences become less pronounced the more you close your aperture.

Given the difference in price, it would be unreasonable to expect the 45mm to be as sharp as the 75mm. Still, the smaller lens performs very well even at the fastest apertures, which is what you’d be most likely to use for portraits.

Below you can see a couple of examples of the sharpness you can attain with the 45mm and 75mm for portraiture. They were taken at the same distance at f/1.8 and f/2.8. Click to see a full res version.

olympus 75mm vs 45mm
GX8, 1/320, f/1.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 45mm
olympus 75mm vs 45mm
GX8, 1/125, f/2.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 45mm
olympus 75mm vs 45mm
GX8, 1/400, f/1.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 75mm
olympus 75mm vs 45mm
GX8, 1/160, f/2.8, ISO 200 – M.Zuiko 75mm


A portrait photographer’s second concern tends to be the quality of the out-of-focus areas of the image, or the bokeh. Generally, the faster the aperture, the creamier the bokeh, so it isn’t a surprise that both lenses were given a fast maximum aperture of 1.8.

By looking at our dedicated tests and observing images we’ve taken out in the field, we can confirm that both lenses render a bokeh that is creamy and smooth especially at the fastest aperture. The specular highlights (bokeh balls) are perfectly round and colour fringing around them is very well-controlled. The attractiveness of the bokeh is helped by the iris diaphragm with seven rounded blades of the 45mm and the iris diaphragm with nine rounded blades of the 75mm.

You can see the full resolution versions of the above images in this dedicated SmugMug gallery.

Of course, given the longer focal length of the 75mm, it does a better job of isolating the subject and obscuring the background. For images with a similar composition, the specular highlights also tend to be larger from the 75mm.

If I had to say which bokeh I liked better, I would probably go for the 75mm as it is just that bit creamier to my eye. However, we have to give credit to the 45mm for being able to compete with a lens that is twice its price.


Focus acquisition is quick and fast on both lenses, especially when used with the latest Micro Four Thirds cameras on the market such as the GX8 or the E-M1. This is no surprise, as M.Zuiko lenses are well-known for their speed. Manual focussing, too, is a pleasant experience thanks to the accurate fly-by-wire ribbed focus ring on both lenses. Granted, it will never be as accurate as a mechanical focus ring, but it does the job.

The 75mm has 0.1x magnification and a close focusing distance of 84cm from the sensor plane, while the 45mm has 0.11x magnification and a close focussing distance of 50cm from the sensor plane. This means that neither lens can focus particularly close. However, you can eek some extra macro performance out of the 75mm if you attach the excellent Raynox 250 adapter (see my review here).

Below are two examples taken with the 45mm and 75mm at their respective closest focus distances. As you can see, you almost end up with the same composition!

Low-Light Performance

A topic that can’t be forgotten is the low-light performance of the two lenses. Since they both have a very fast maximum aperture of 1.8, you can easily use them in dimly-lit venues like a church, wedding reception, concert hall or auditorium without having to raise your ISO values too much. This is especially true if you use the lenses in conjunction with Micro Four Thirds bodies with in-body stabilisation like the OM-D series, Pen E-PL7, or Lumix GX7/GX8.


I couldn’t really conclude this article without mentioning the price. On their respective release dates, the 45mm cost about $400 while the 75mm was $899. These days, you can find the 45mm for even cheaper – I’ve seen it as low as $200 – whereas the 75mm has retained its value much better.

The long and the short of it is that those taking their first steps into the world of photography and those on a tight budget should definitely start out with the 45mm. In terms of pure value for money, you’ll be hard pressed to find something better.


In the end, Mathieu and I decided to buy and keep both the 45mm and 75mm for our photography. Why, you might ask? Well, despite the fact that they are both portrait lenses, they actually fulfil very different needs.

The M.Zuiko 45mm is the perfect compact companion for holidays or outings where you have to pack light. For example, I often used it on class field trips to photograph the children when I was a teacher. It provides enough quality to satisfy even professional needs and won’t break the bank of a budding portrait photographer just getting his or her feet wet. Also, being a 90mm equivalent, it is a very flexible lens suited to head shots, upper torso shots and environmental portraiture.

The M.Zuiko 75mm is a much more specialised lens and the price tag reflects this. It is the kind of lens you’d find inside the bag of a seasoned portrait photographer. While best suited to head shots, it is also the ideal prime for event, wedding and candid portrait photography where you are far away from your subject. We also use this lens when sharpness is paramount.

If you still aren’t sure which to get, ask yourself this: are you new to portrait photography, or are you a working photographer whose workflow consists of frequent portraiture?

The former should make a beeline for the 45mm, while the latter should definitely consider the 75mm for the utmost quality, or perhaps even invest in both to have some extra flexibility on the job.

Are you interested in knowing more about the 45mm and 75mm? If so, check out these additional articles!

Do you own either of these portrait lenses? If so, share your experience below!

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Heather Broster

Heather Broster was born in Canada, has lived in Japan and Italy but currently calls Wales home. She is a full-time gear tester at MirrorLessons. You can follow her on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Lacknafta

    Well-written article. “One of the biggest concerns of portrait photographers is the sharpness
    of the lens. Thankfully, both the M.Zuiko 45mm and 75mm perform very
    well even at their fastest aperture of f/1.8 and are therefore perfectly
    suited to the genre.” — as a rather solitary voice, albeit not entirely alone, I’m not too keen on sharpness for peoples’ faces. Fast vintage lenses usually have lower contrast and spherical aberrations wide open and near that but I’d rather see glow than forehead lines or pores. As such I’m not a fan of the majority of portrait shots I see today. Welladay, to each their own after all : )

  • mick massie

    I don’t have either of these lenses, but I started with the 60mm f2.8 macro which is a stupendous lens for portraits and macro. I couldn’t justify buying either of these other lenses.

  • Heather Broster

    Very good point, Katarina. I suppose it all comes down to genres of photography you enjoy the most, and the amount of reach you need!

  • Heather Broster

    Thanks for sharing your experience, Gordks! I agree with you about the 25mm being a bit too wide but it can be good for very active subjects like toddlers whose movements are hard to predict!

  • Paul Stuart

    Have tried the pro olympus zoom lenses ,i know there not primes so you do not have such large apertures at given range but they do have equal sharpness at same apertures as those pana leica ,its a shame that panasonic and olympus have not made some f2 zooms for better subject isolation you could almost do away with a selection primes something like the sigma 18-35 f1.8 for apsc for m43 .
    Ok a zoom will probably never match the rendering of prime or low light advantages but it gives greater opportunities and more scope.

  • Gordks

    I have the 45mm and absolutely love it for living room, family photographs in natural light. It is perfect for unplanned, unposed photos. I also have the Lumix 25mm 1.4. It is another good lens but I use the 45mm more often since it allows a greater distance to the subject. With the 25mm you have to get so close when trying to fill the frame that distortion starts to show up, and you get in the way as well.

    I have never had the opportunity to try the 75mm but could see it being better in a larger room or outdoors. I absolutely WILL have one in time. These fast lenses allow taking those photos I always wanted to take but couldn’t (when still using bridge cameras) because there was just too little light. I don’t like the look of flash. On the E-M5 II, with it’s great white balance and stabilization, I have never even thought to try it’s flash. I forgot I even had it until I found myself wondering what that little black felt package was that I found in my camera bag.

    Go for the 45mm. You will never be sorry, and the price is very easy to handle. Get the 75mm if, and when, you need it. If, as good as it is, you decide you don’t need it, you have saved quite a lot.

  • soundimageplus

    I have both too and would agree with what you have written. One thing has always puzzled me though. The 75mm is so good, indeed one the sharpest lenses I have ever used, so how come Olympus have never matched it’s quality with other focal lengths?

    Panasonic have three Leica badged lenses, the 15mm f/1.7, the 25mm f/f.4 and the 42.5mm f/1.2 that are simply stunning, but Olympus apart from the 75mm f/1.8 and to a certain extent the 45mm f/1.8 have a range of competent, but hardly outstanding lenses. And considering their pedigree with the 4/3 DSLR lenses that they made, that is somewhat strange. Maybe it’s the Leica input, maybe they prioritise size over ultimate quality, who knows. And their f/2.8 zooms, while very useful, are hardly stand out lenses optically.

    Coming into m4/3 I would have expected Olympus to produce more great prime lenses than they actually have. And I really can’t think of a reason why this should be the case. Especially when you consider the prices of many of them. Odd.

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owners of this website, Heather Broster and Mathieu Gasquet, are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, eBay Partner Network, Macphun Affiliate Program, Peak Design Affiliate Program, The Inspired Eye Affiliate Program, SmugMug Affiliate Program and Mediterranean Photo Tours Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay, Macphun, Peak Design, The Inspired Eye, SmugMug and Mediterranean Photo Tours properties properties. They are also members of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.