src=" Sony FE 24-240mm Review – MirrorLessons
FE 24-240mm

Date: 07/09/2015 | By: Mathieu

The “all-purpose” lens for the A7 series – Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 Review

DMC-GX8, 1/250, f/ 9/1, ISO 200

The “all-purpose” lens for the A7 series – Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 Review

This is one of those articles that wasn’t planned but rather happened because of convenience. The 24-240mm was not at the top of my list of lenses to test but it turned out that I needed a telephoto lens to take some pictures of the Tour of Britain 2015 since Stage 1 was passing through Wales. Unfortunately neither the 70-200mm f/4 nor any of the telephoto A-mount lenses were available to hire for that weekend.

As such, I turned to the native FE 24-240mm and used it intensively all weekend to have enough material to write about. These kinds of zooms (and kit lenses too) are often not the best example of what you can get from an optical quality point of view – they are designed for convenience instead. A lens with a non-constant aperture of f/3.5-6.3 is certainly less attractive at first but when I have to review such a product, I always think back to one of my favourite photographs I took when I started taking photography seriously. It was a cold and foggy morning in 2009 and I was using a Nikon D90 with the cheap 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 lens.

All-purpose / Kit lenses can do the job
Taken in 2009 with a Nikon D90 and 18-105mm kit lens

The bottom line is that some photographers will ignore these kinds of lenses while others prefer the versatility they can offer. (After all, we are talking about a 10x full-frame zoom lens here.) You can get interesting results and have the reassurance that you will never miss a shot due to not having the correct focal length mounted. However, in terms of pure optical quality, you are constrained to specific settings. It is a matter of understanding how much you are willing to sacrifice for the sake of versatility.

Note: I tested the 24-240mm on the A7r mark II. I should also specify that the article is intended more as a quick review than an in-depth article since I usually spend two weeks with the gear I test.

sony 24-240mm review
A7r II, 1/1250, f/11, ISO 200 – 240mm
sony 24-240mm review
A7r II, 1/250, f/8, ISO 100 – 78mm
sony 24-240mm review
A7r II, 1/500, f/8, ISO 200 – 24mm
The Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Main Specs
  • Focal length: 24-240mm (10x zoom)
  • Maximum aperture: 3.5-6.3
  • Minimum aperture: 22-40
  • No. of aperture blade: 7 (circular)
  • Angle of view: 84-10°
  • Closest focusing distance: 50-80cm
  • Lens configuration: 17 elements / 12 groups
  • Special elements: 5 Aspherical, 1 ED elements
  • Maximum image magnification: 0.27
  • Optical Image Stabiliser: Yes
  • Dimensions: φ80.5mm Ø, 118.5 mm
  • Filter diamater: 72mm
  • Weight: 780g

Design and Ease of Use

sony 24-240mm review

The 24-240mm is bulky and heavy (780g). It definitely feels like a DSLR lens. It is not the first time that I’ve made this comment when testing Sony’s full-frame lenses. Some of them are as large, if not larger, than their DSLR counterparts and I guess we just need to get used to it. It also depends on how the lens has been designed and what technology is built into it. For example the Nikkor 28-30mm f/3.5-5.6 is only 20g heavier and is actually slightly shorter (when zoomed out) while the Canon equivalent is heavier, larger and definitely built to higher standards (1.6kg, 184mm long).

The dimensions almost double when zoomed in which is a common characteristic of this type of lens. The zoom ring is not the best I’ve tried and lacks some smoothness. I guess Sony designed it that way so that the lens won’t extend itself accidentally but I found it somewhat unpleasant to use. The focus ring is nicer but I admit I didn’t need it during those three days.

The 24-240mm has a metal build on the outside and the two rings are covered with rubber. The lens is also dust and moisture resistant and comes with a plastic petal-shaped hood.

Through the lens: optical quality

The main reason to consider a lens like this is also the most obvious one: the convenience of having a 10x zoom allows you to take a wide variety of different shots.

The other evening while driving back home, the scene you see below suddenly presented itself to us. The sun was just about to set, and the colours and contrast were wonderful thanks to the reflection on the lake and the silhouette of the trees. Luckily I found a spot nearby to park the car so I could run back to take the shot. There were many elements in the foreground I was not interested in including in my frame but the lens allowed me to zoom out to 190mm to get the right composition. That’s what a lens like this is useful for if you don’t want to carry multiple lenses.

Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/250, f/11, ISO 100 – 191mm

Now let’s rewind to Friday afternoon. I started using the lens during a walk up Bird Rock to take some landscape shots. The zoom range can be very useful for this genre because you can switch between wide scenes and isolated portions of the frame especially when there is some interesting light. Also, starting at 24mm gives you lots to work with on the wide-angle end.

Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/100, f/11, ISO 100 – 24mm
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/125, f/11, ISO 100 – 24mm
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/125, f/11, ISO 100 – 80mm
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/250, f/8, ISO 100 – 152mm

While its versatility is certainly a welcome feature, I started to see the limits of this lens even during the first day. At the longest focal lengths, there is a loss in sharpness that is even more evident at the fastest apertures: the results are quite soft in the sharpness and micro-contrast departments.

Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 review
A7r II, 1/320, f/8, ISO 100 – 240mm
Click on the image to open the full res version.
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS review
A7r II, 1/200, f/6.3, ISO 100 – 240mm
Click on the image to open the full res version

At the shortest focal lengths, the optimal sharpness can be found between f/5.6 and f/8 while at the telephoto end you will get the best results from f/11 to f/16 before diffraction starts to get in the way. The performance at the corners is worse than in the centre. Depending on the light, shooting at f/11 may also mean you’ll have to use slower shutter speeds and deal with some blur. The A7r II stabilisation system helps but with the original A7r, I would advise that you use a tripod.

The lens deals a little bit better with sharpness when you focus closer. The minimum focus distance is more interesting at the telephoto end (50cm at 24mm and 80cm at 240mm) and can indeed give some nice results with acceptable sharpness. Also, if you take advantage of the telephoto capabilities, it can also be a decent lens for occasional portraits.

Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS review
A7r II, 1/4000, f/3.5, ISO 200 – 24mm
Click on the image to open the full res version
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS review
A7r II, 1/160, f/5.6, ISO 200 – 83mm
Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS review
A7r II, 1/100, f/6.3, ISO 100 – 240mm

The 24-240mm can suffer from heavy distortion both at the wide and telephoto ends. However a simple click on the lens profile in Lightroom CC will fix it almost entirely. The same thing happens with the in-camera JPG processing. This is how every Sony lens works; they produce lots of distortion in the native Raw files but the results can easily be corrected with the dedicated lens profile (even the Zeiss Batis lenses are based on a similar concept, although distortion is less severe). This is why it becomes difficult to judge the lens from this point of view: distortion can be awful but also easily corrected with the dedicated lens profile. If you observe the final output, I would say it is okay even though your frame will receive a tiny crop at the edges.

Below is an example before then after applying the lens profile in Lightroom CC.


Vignetting appears especially on the wide-angle end but the same reasoning applies here: you can get rid of it easily in Lightroom and the camera takes care the OOC JPG. I haven’t found any relevant traces of chromatic aberration so that is something that is well-controlled from the start.

Below is another example using Lightroom CC.


Sony doesn’t mention any special coating for minimising flares but overall the lens behaves well. I found some minor ghost flares like in the example below.

Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/2500, f/3.5, ISO 100 – 24mm

Autofocus and performance

On Saturday I visited the town of Porthmadog and had a journey on the Ffestiniog Railway (with a great pint of Welsh Black Beer) so I basically used the lens as a travel photographer would have. Overall the autofocus performance was excellent with the A7r mark II in all sorts of situations including backlight.

Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/160, f/6.3, ISO 400 – 212mm

As I said at the beginning of this article, the main reason I hired the lens for the weekend was to photograph the Tour of Britain passing through Betws-Y-Coed on Sunday. The weather was cloudy and given the not-so-fast aperture, I had to accept a compromise by shooting at f/5-6/6.3 and sacrifice some sharpness to keep the ISO under 800 and a fast shutter speed between 1/800 and 1/1000. The autofocus motor works well with the A7r mark II AF system but for fast moving subjects, I noticed a slightly slower performance in comparison to other FE lenses. It’s not the best combination for sports photography because of the slow apertures, the lack of sharpness wide open and the slow-ish AF motor.

Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/1000, f/6.3, ISO 800 – 240mm
Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/1000, f/6.3, ISO 800 – 240mm

The lens includes optical stabilisation (Sony Steadyshot) but that is a feature I couldn’t test completely since the A7r II uses it in conjunction with the sensor stabilisation. After the Tour of Britain, I had a walk along the Afon Llugwy river and tried to take hand-held shots with slow shutter speeds to give the water more movement.

I was able to push the shutter speed down to 1/3s at 24mm and 1/15s at 240mm but not without several attempts. I admit I am not particularly impressed by the 5-axis stabilisation of the new A7r II so I wouldn’t be surprised if you can get similar results with just the optical stabilisation on other A7 cameras (perhaps with 1/2 or 1 Ev less compensation).

Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/3s, f/11, ISO 50 – 24mm
Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/5, f/18, ISO 100 – 101mm
Sony 24-240mm OSS review
A7r II, 1/15, f/11, ISO 100 – 240mm


It is difficult to make a final judgement on this lens because it is the only one of its kind for the full-frame E-Mount system. So it is either this one or nothing if you are looking for an all-purpose zoom to use on your Sony A7 camera. In its defence, it covers a very intelligent range of focal lengths. Starting at 24mm instead of 28mm like other similar zooms gives you more room for wide-angle shots.

Sony FE 24-240mm review
A7r II, 1/250, f/11, ISO 100 – 24mm (4 shots stitched with Lightroom CC)

All things considered though, I have to say that this lens is a no-go for me and that is because of its price. At nearly $1000, I would have expected better optical performance at the fastest apertures. Shooting at f/6.3 at 200mm can already be quite limiting in some situations, and these limits only increase if you want the best sharpness at f/11.

Sony FE 24-240mm review
A7r II, 1/25, f/5.6, ISO 100 – 69mm

Perhaps testing it on the A7r mark II and its 42 megapixels was an overly harsh test for the lens – a 24MP sensor might be more forgiving. You need high quality lenses to get the most out of the sensor in cameras like the A7r II and this 24-240mm, in my opinion, is not one of them. The performance is decent and if you want versatility more than anything else, it can do the job once you recognise its limitations. Still, it would make much more sense if it cost half its current price.

thumb-up What I like about the Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

  • Excellent range of focal lengths from wide to telephoto
  • Dust and moisture resistant
  • Good CA and flare resistance
  • Good performance at the centre when stopped down to middle apertures

thumb-down What I don’t like about the Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

  • Large and bulky
  • Zoom ring lacks some smoothness
  • Lack of sharpness at the fastest apertures (both wide and telephoto)
  • Expensive for the quality it gives you

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Mathieu Gasquet

Mathieu Gasquet is a professional photographer with French and Italian origins. Besides running his own video and photography studio 3Dit Lab, he is also the official photographer for the National Cinema Museum in Turin. You can follow him on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Lucas Guitink

    Yes, for travelling a lens with this reach can be a great blessing. No lens changing needed. No time lost. No dust on the sensor. And yes, having a good tele reach is a great advantage when travelling.

    I feel very much attracted to the Sony bodies indeed, but up to now I have not seen a lens solution that would fit the bill for me. If you go full frame (to get the best quality and low light conditions) it is clear from the beginning that you will end up with very heavy and bulky gear. Not easy for travelling, but quality doesn’t come cheap or convenient. Yet this lens doesn’t seem to bring one the quality advantage over smaller systems, so why would one take this path.

    Then there is the APS-C choice with the excellent Sony A6300. But that doesn’t bring a solution either, since Sony hasn’t released a g and compact megazoom for that format. I hope that one day Sony will realise that bringing cutting-edge bodies to the market alone is not enough. We need lenses too that are attractive in size, quality and price.

    For now I am forced to stay with my Panasonic Lumix 14-140 mark II lens which is compact, light and reasonably sharp. If Panasonic can make such lenses, why can’t Sony?

  • bwana

    I’ve used this lens since it became available and really like it. It is half the price of the FE 70-200 f/4 and yields better image quality, is versatile and a great general purpose lens. It pretty much lives on my A7R II or, optionally, my A7 II.

    The above said, any zoom lens will probably not be as sharp as a high $$$ prime but the versatility of a zoom lens has its advantages.

  • Mathieu

    Thanks for the kind words Mike 😉

  • Sean T

    Sounds like a great travel lens but that’s it. Since that’s what it’s designed for, I guess it’s a success.

  • Mike Hendren

    Thanks for the honest review, Mathieu. I’ve been considering this lens, but after reading your thoughts about it, I think I’ll find another option.
    Keep up the great work. You guys always seem to present just what we’re looking for … answers to our questions. :-)

  • Mathieu

    I’ll give it a try, thanks for the hint 😉

  • Henrik Fessler

    For a long time I used zooms, and this type of megazooms could be ok, when you’re afraid to miss out a shot due to a required angle of view. And maybe such a megazoom could also be a versatile tool when you’re afraid of changing a lens in a dusty and humid environment … maybe this is a lens for expeditions in deserts or jungles?
    Currently I am happy not to miss tele ranges and I am quite happy with a set of primes (fish eye for Panoramas, a 20mm wide angle, and a 35 and 50 … all fitting into my photo back pack) … never would have thought to be comfortable with having only primes, but I am not roaming deserts or jungles either :-) !
    For me, the 24-240 seems to be way too bulky for the original idea of having a mirrorless camera in a small package.

  • T N Args

    Maybe try the Lumix equivalent lens. Also expensive at $500, but very surprisingly respectable optics across its range, and …. 265g.

    Thanks for the review..

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owners of this website, Heather Broster and Mathieu Gasquet, are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, eBay Partner Network, Macphun Affiliate Program, Peak Design Affiliate Program, The Inspired Eye Affiliate Program, SmugMug Affiliate Program and Mediterranean Photo Tours Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay, Macphun, Peak Design, The Inspired Eye, SmugMug and Mediterranean Photo Tours properties properties. They are also members of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.