src=" Olympus 75mm f/1.8 Review - MirrorLessons
Lens Reviews

Date: 04/08/2015 | By: Mathieu

Better late than never! – The Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 Review

ILCE-6000, 1/60, f/ 56/10, ISO 200

Better late than never! – The Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 Review

In the series of “lenses I have been using for a while but haven’t reviewed yet” comes another gem that has always found a place in my daily work bag. The M.Zuiko 75mm is a telephoto prime lens with a fast aperture of 1.8. It is also ranked as one of the best Micro Four Thirds primes ever, and rightfully so.

I first tried the 75mm when I reviewed the OM-D E-M1 in 2013. For my work, I was using the Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8 (review here) and at the time I thought that it was the more versatile of the two. Then at the beginning of 2014, I decided that I wanted a telephoto alternative with a faster aperture. I was satisfied with the Panasonic zoom but I also wanted something that could give me more light for my event work with the OM-D E-M1.

I didn’t expect that the 75mm would rapidly substitute the Panasonic zoom lens for most of my work.

olympus 75mm review
E-M5 II, 1/20, f/2, ISO 400
olympus 75mm review
E-P5, 1/8000, f/7.1, ISO 200


The M.Zuiko 75mm ED f/1.8 Specs
  • Focal length: 75mm
  • Focal length (equiv. 35mm): 150mm
  • Maximum aperture: 1.8
  • Minimum aperture: 22
  • Number of aperture blades: 9 circular aperture diaphragm
  • Angle of view: 16°
  • Closest focusing distance: 84cm
  • Lens configuration: 10 elements / 9 groups
  • Special elements: 3 ED, 2 HR elements
  • Lens surface coating: Yes (ZERO Coating)
  • Maximum image magnification: 0.1x (MFT) / 0.2x (35mm)
  • Optical Image Stabilizer: None
  • Dimensions: 64mm Ø, 69 mm
  • Filter diamater: 58mm
  • Weight: 305g

Design and ease of use

The 75mm has a premium build with an all-metal surface. It is light but its best characteristics are its compactness and portability. It comes with either a silver or black finish. Unfortunately it is not weather sealed, although this has never been a problem for me. Another negative point is that the LH-61F metal hood is not supplied with the lens and thus needs to be purchased separately, which is a shame as the 75mm is labelled as a premium lens. The original hood is very solid – the connection mechanism is easy to use and you can also reverse it when you put the lens away. I can thoroughly recommend it but it isn’t cheap. A good alternrative is also the JJC LH-J61F  (thank you Fred for reminding me in the comments). It is also made of metal but comes at a cheaper price. I own a metal hood by JJC for my Fujifilm X100T and it is excellent.

The only ring you will find on the lens is the focus ring which is of course “fly by wire.” It is pleasant to use and very smooth. Out of the various electronic rings I’ve tried on many lenses, this is certainly one of my favourite for Micro Four Thirds. That said, I admit that I rarely focus manually with it.

The lens’ autofocus is really fast thanks to the MSC motor. It is also very silent. I used it on several occasion for dance shows and at sports event and the autofocus has always been fast and reliable. However there isn’t any optical stabilisation which means that it is more limited on Lumix cameras that lack sensor stabilisation. (The GX7 and GX8 are the only Lumix models with IBIS.)

olympus 75mm review
E-M5 II, 1/2000, f/2.8, ISO 200

Through the lens: optical quality

You know that the quality of a lens is good when you look back at your photos on the computer and realise that you use it not only for the main purpose for which it was conceived (in this case, portraiture), but also for various other situations and genres. Even though a fixed focal length might not always be appropriate, you tend to use it because you know that it delivers in terms of optical quality. This is certainly the main reason I gradually began to use it more than the Lumix telephoto. What’s more, its small size means that I can easily fit it inside any bag I use.

75mm for portraits

This is certainly one of the genres that suits this lens the best, but the focal length might not satisfy everyone. 75mm gives you an equivalent focal length of 150mm on 35mm format which is longer than the usual portrait focal length (85 or 105). It works very well in large spaces but if you are in a small studio or restricted environment, you might have more trouble creating enough distance between you and your subject unless you are doing head shots. This is a valid point, especially if you are considering this lens as your only portrait lens.

That said, in terms of sharpness wide open and bokeh rendering, the 75mm delivers great results. I’ve never found relevant traces of vignetting. There is some chromatic aberration in extremely contrasty areas (like the fourth picture below – look at the camera Heather is wearing). I’ve almost always found the sharpness at 1.8 sufficient. Of course the best sharpness will occur at f/2.8. To me the only rival when it comes to portraits is the Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2 but it has a different aperture and focal length. But before the Nocticron, this lens was the best option for portraits and is still a relevant choice if you can cope with the longer focal length.

olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M5 II, 1/15, f/1.8, ISO 800
olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M5 II, 1/25, f/1.8, ISO 800
olympus 75mm 1.8 review
GH4, 1/400, f/1.8, ISO 200
olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M5 II, 1/1250, f/2, ISO 200


75mm for events

I decided to use this lens more than the Lumix 35-100mm mainly to have that extra shallow depth of field. When working at events, the background behind the people you photograph is not always pleasant or particularly interesting. Having the chance to blur it more allowed me to keep my subject at the centre of attention. Of course with the Lumix lens I could have zoomed in at 100mm, but being an f/2.8 vs f/1.8 on a Micro Four Thirds sensor, I simply find the M.Zuiko 75mm more attractive.

At first, I thought that having a single focal length would create problems but the more I used it, the more I realised it was just a matter of moving around and finding the right spot to create my composition. Of course it is not always possible to be positioned exactly where you want to be, so a prime lens can also have its limits. But when you have the freedom to move around, it will certainly deliver better results than a zoom.

olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/160, f/1.8, ISO 1000
olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/100, f/1.8, ISO 800
olympus 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/100, f/1.8, ISO 800


75mm for shows

Given its excellent results at f/1.8, I’ve also found this lens useful for artistic shows like contemporary dance or music concerts. Now here the choice can be more critical, which is why I wouldn’t advise that you bring just the 75mm. The focal length you choose really depends on where the photographer can stand. In my case, I often have the chance to be positioned close to the stage, so I can switch between a wide angle lens and the 75mm for close-ups. The 1.8 aperture is a great asset since these shows are often poorly lit. It allows me to keep my ISO values as low as possible, usually no more than 3200 ISO. As mentioned already, the AF of the E-M1 (and also the E-M5 II) is very responsive, so I don’t have any difficulty taking these shots. Also, except for some minor purple flares that can occur around a strong light source, this lens has excellent flare resistance.

m zuiko 75mm 1.8 review
E-M5 II, 1/60, f/1.8, ISO 3200
m zuiko 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/160, f/1.8, ISO 500
m zuiko 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/200, f/1.8, ISO 800
m zuiko 75mm 1.8 review
E-M1, 1/200, f/2.8, ISO 3200


75mm for landscapes

I really like landscape shots taken with a telephoto lens. The M.Zuiko 75mm already has excellent sharpness at f/1.8 but it gets even better when stopped down. The sweet spot is around f/4 and f/5.6 but it remains very sharp up to f/11. After that, some diffraction will start to appear. The best sharpness is found at the centre but I find the performance at the corners excellent too and that’s why I like to use it for landscape work. (Since a zoom lens will give you more precision in framing your image, the Lumix 35-100 is also a valid option for telephoto landscape photography, also because you don’t really need the fast 1.8 aperture.)

m zuiko 75mm review
E-M1, 1/500, f/11, ISO 200
m zuiko 75mm review
E-M1, 1/400, f/11, ISO 200
m zuiko 75mm review
E-M1, 1/500, f/11, ISO 200
m zuiko 75mm review
E-M1, 1/800, f/8, ISO 200


Often images and extensive user experience have more value than lab tests or out-of-context pictures taken just to find some weaknesses that may or may not matter. The M.Zuiko 75mm is a lens I haven’t regretted purchasing. In fact, I’ve used more than I originally thought I would. It is not just the optical quality, which is obviously superb, but also its compact size that made me choose it over other similar telephoto lenses. I have said this many times, but I’ll say it once again: this is what I love about Micro Four Thirds. This kind of quality in such a small package isn’t something to be underestimated.

Just bear in mind that a 75mm fixed focal length is not always easy to use. You can sometimes find yourself too close or not close enough to the action. Also, it doesn’t come with optical stabilisation, which can be a disadvantage for Panasonic Lumix users.

thumb-up What I like about the M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8:

  • Good sharpness wide open, excellent when stopped down
  • Small and compact prime lens with a premium feel
  • Fast and silent autofocus motor

thumb-down What I don’t like about the M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8:

  • Hood not included with the lens
  • Not weather sealed
  • No optical stabilisation which can be problematic for Lumix users without a stabilised body

Like our blog? Be sure to follow us on Facebook and Twitter! If you’re planning on buying camera gear, you can check out Amazon and Adorama. Prices remain the same for you, but a small percentage of your purchase value is valued back to us. Thank you!

About the author: Mathieu Gasquet

Mathieu Gasquet is a professional photographer with French and Italian origins. Besides running his own video and photography studio 3Dit Lab, he is also the official photographer for the National Cinema Museum in Turin. You can follow him on Google+, Twitter or Facebook!

  • Scott Henderson

    I love this lens, and I wish I used it more than I do. I brought it out of the bag for Easter family portraits last weekend, and remembered why I dropped the $900 to buy it. Paired with my EM1, the images that I was able to create were stunning, especially considering it was on the M43 system (sample attached – 1/160, f/4, ISO 200).

    I suppose I have the same sentiments toward this lens as I do the 12mm f/2 – even though I have an amazing zoom that covers that focal length (7-14 2.8 and 40-150 2.8), I just can’t bring myself to part with the fast prime.

  • Mathieu

    Yes that’s about right. The 75 has something more concerning optical quality. I use the 35-100 only when the convenience of a zoom lens becomes essential. But most of the time, I found myself satisfied with just the 75.

  • NC

    Thanks Mathieu that is very encouraging. I was for a long time looking at the Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 but after your review of the 75mm f1.8 you seemed to think as I do ie make the lens work for you and move around as required or as needed. My thinking is that the overall subject isolation you mentioned and can be achieved and quality of the 75mm f1.8 make it a ‘lens that will give you wow results’ versus the Panasonic which is ‘a very good lens that wont disappoint but is also unlikely to give the wow factor.. is that about right? Thanks

  • Mathieu

    If you are ok with the Sigma 60 you will be fine with the 75. Just keep an eye on your shutter speed and make sure that you don’t use a value that is too slow. I used the 75 often on the GH4 and got nice results.

  • NC

    I had the opportunity to look and take a few shots with the 75mm f1.8 at a recent photo show in Lincoln UK and didn’t want to put it down. Just felt right. I currently use lumix bodies including G6 and wondered where you think I may struggle with it without IS? As I use the sigma 60mm f2.8 seemingly without any issues..thanks for advice

  • J.L. Williams

    Yes, if you want a Fuji comparison, it makes more sense to compare the 75 Olympus to the recently-released 90mm Fuji f/2; angles of view are more similar. Fuji advantages: focuses closer; shallower DOF if that’s what you want; weather resistant if you care about that. Olympus advantages: much smaller and lighter, less expensive. Fuji might be a tiny bit sharper, but I get sharper pictures with the Olympus because Olympus bodies are stabilized and Fuji bodies aren’t. More here:

  • J.L. Williams

    I bought one of those hoods off eBay and sent it back. The inner clamp band would scrape against the lens barrel when I’d attach it, and I didn’t want to risk marring the lens for no good reason. Maybe they’ve improved the design since then…

  • Anastas Stas Tarpanov

    I absolutely adore this lens. Great sharpness, tones and bokeh.

  • Mathieu

    True, I completely forgot JJC also sells a hood for the 75mm. I have the metal hood for the X100T and it is really nice. Thanks :)

  • Fred Flintstone

    I purchased a JJC lens hood off eBay, 1/3rd the price, still made of metal and works fine

  • Joe Turic

    Yea, that’s why this is tough…I think the 45 would be fine for the vast majority of shots…the 75 is beautiful…but it might be tough for me to justify :)

  • Mathieu

    Yes I remember your article and pictures, nice work 😉

  • Mathieu

    With the Fuji 56mm it would be more interesting to compare the Nocticron 42.5mm :)

  • Mathieu

    It would work especially outdoors if you find some nice locations and have the freedom to put the right distance between you and the bride. Indoors it could be used for close ups mainly. In the church it can also be useful to take some close up shots of the bride and groom. So it can certainly be a good addition for weddings, but I would consider it only if you are really missing a longer focal length than the 45.

  • Joe Turic

    Great review! This might tip me over the edge. I”m shooting a wedding this fall and I’m pretty sure the combo of the Olympus 12-40, 25 and 45 will do me fine…but I still keep thinking how nice it would be to get some bridal portraits with the 75mm. Decisions…decisions :)

  • Whinney

    Good review. How about a comparison between this and the Fuji 55mm 1.2 or the uji under the same circumstances.

  • Pierre Aden

    Great examples – I love the 75mm, too – it’s not a one trick pony as many often think. I reviewed it earlier this year:

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice

The owner of this website, Heather Broster, is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, B&H Photo Affiliate Program, the eBay Partner Network, and the Adorama Affiliate Program, all of which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking MirrorLessons ( to Amazon, B&H Photo, eBay and Adorama properties. She is also a member of Google AdSense. AdSense publishers must have and abide by a privacy policy that discloses that third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your users’ browsers, or using web beacons to collect information as a result of ad serving on your website.

To see more information, visit our full Disclaimer page. Thank you!

© Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons, 2014. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Heather Broster/Mathieu Gasquet and MirrorLessons with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.